By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 53 - Touhou

theprof00 said:
"spurgeonryan said:
Just as we thought.

I didn't catch this at first. Why else would he say "we" unless he was in a group of more than one. It is a mistake he had to have made subconsciously and not realized. Either that, or it was a mistake he made somehow while angry.




Nintendo still doomed?
Feel free to add me on 3DS or Switch! (PM me if you do ^-^)
Nintendo ID: Mako91                  3DS code: 4167-4543-6089

Around the Network
hatmoza said:
Well fuck me. I thought spurge was scum for sure... and it's the only reason I agreed to this so I could exact my revenge on F-F.

Spurge is a terrible player and he is/was in fact town.


Well, of course you are going to say he was town. Whether he was mafia/ town/ sk/ whatever you have to say he/you was/are town.




Nintendo still doomed?
Feel free to add me on 3DS or Switch! (PM me if you do ^-^)
Nintendo ID: Mako91                  3DS code: 4167-4543-6089

hatmoza said:

I'm town cop.

The only problem I have with this is that the cop is not going to come out and counter claim you, if you are not the cop. It is the perfect claim because you want the most powerful town to come forward and also because he can't come forward because of the danger he will be in. No matter what, you win as mafia. If he comes forward you kill him. If he doesn't come forward you live on until he does claim (getting more time).

Unvote

Vote: Hatmoza

I simply don't believe your claim. It is too convenient.




Nintendo still doomed?
Feel free to add me on 3DS or Switch! (PM me if you do ^-^)
Nintendo ID: Mako91                  3DS code: 4167-4543-6089

Again with the hypothetical analysis that I'm claiming to lure in the so called real cop when the simpler explanation is I am the cop. It's these over analyzations that make day one disasters a norm on VGC mafia.

All I care about right now is for Linkz to counter claim or admit he's bluffing so he doesn't go unquestioned if I do get lynched. I don't want Linkz to argue "I never claimed cop" the following day and be let off the hook if I get lynched and flip town cop.

FoS Mario for not being patient enough for Linkz response.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

hatmoza said:
theprof00 said:
ugh i hate repeaying myself.
spurge said if he kept being pushed, he would revert to his typical pattern (which is roleclaiming) which he confirmed by saying "town needs me" and "one sentence is all i need to wave away your accusations".
i told him to claim.
he said no he would instead, wait til hammer.
i told him to claim or id kill him. he went silent. i said if you dont claim by the top of the hour, you're a dead man.
He then goaded me to kill him saying he wouldn't claim.
Then on top of it, said," just as we thought. you're an sk", which i might confirm, nobody else at least in this thread, had mentioned.
I said he was delaying and waiting for scumbuddies to tell him what to claim.
soon after he was done with the thread and would take his role to his grave.

that's what is scummy.

For comparison sake this was your original case from a few hours ago:

theprof00 said:
can't do links now hat im on phone.
things like him saying "just as we thought"
or exploding when i voted him
him attacking my credibility which is what he did last time as scum.
him trying to shift focus away from him
claiming that it will be hard for town to win without him yet refusing to claim and backing down when i encouraged him to claim cop.
referring to me as town yet voting me.
saying "[prof] you will never live this down". clear implication that im town.

My question is: how are you repeating yourself when most of your more recent case was not included in the the original post where I asked you to give me your case on Spurge? Why the additions when you could have included most of your argument in your original case?

It seems like you are building a case instead of already having a case.For example, you stressed the "one sentence thing twice recently yet you never mention it at all in you original post. Why is this a part of your case all of a sudden? That's more of a rhetorical question, and frankly it doesn't sit well with me. Again, it seems like an addition to build a case you never had.

What further raises questions about your first post is how general it is. "Spurge exploded when I voted him" What does that mean? That could mean anything. "He attacked your credibility"... So? How does that make him a suspect? And where do you mention any of this in your next post? How did most of your reasons from your first post change so drastically?

 

I don't like how inconsistent you are right now.


I would like at least some kind of rebuttal to my claim that you are building a case against Spurge as you go. Moreso, I would like responses from other users on this as well. Just because Linkz is going insane and is currently allowing for the both of us to absorb all the spotlight doesn't mean a free pass for everyone to sit back.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

Around the Network

Like I said, even if he was the cop, it would be too risky for him to claim as such.

I completely understand what you are saying though. The other option is that you simply ARE THE COP.

I am very patient, but I don't see him claiming.




Nintendo still doomed?
Feel free to add me on 3DS or Switch! (PM me if you do ^-^)
Nintendo ID: Mako91                  3DS code: 4167-4543-6089

That said. I'm more inclined to believe prof is scum then Linkz for reason i point out in my post above. I strongly believe Linkz is a town using a disastrous bluff.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

supermario128 said:
Like I said, even if he was the cop, it would be too risky for him to claim as such.

I completely understand what you are saying though. The other option is that you simply ARE THE COP.

I am very patient, but I don't see him claiming.


This kind of logic kills me. That doesn't mean sit on your ass and put a cap on the matter. You need to ask questions then. Why would he claim to know who the cop was if you think it was too dangerous to do so?  Why such a contradictory dilemma? If it's too risky at this stage of the game, why even make such a statement?

I'm only getting more suspicious with you.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

hatmoza said:

Why would he claim to know who the cop was if you think it was too dangerous to do so?  Why such a contradictory dilemma? If it's too risky at this stage of the game, why even make such a statement?

I'm only getting more suspicious with you.


Either...

He is bluffing to see how you would react.

OR

He actually knows something the rest of us don't.

If he just said so to see your reaction that isn't very risky. He he fully claims and turns out to be a liar obviously that is very risky. Maybe it would be worth it for mafia to get the cop lynched though. We will find out soon enough, unless he doesn't get drunk. :P




Nintendo still doomed?
Feel free to add me on 3DS or Switch! (PM me if you do ^-^)
Nintendo ID: Mako91                  3DS code: 4167-4543-6089

zero129 said:
Hatz is....................
vanilla town!! O_O
But really i think he is......
Mafia Role Cop O_O ..........
Na na im just kidding again..
Hatz is......
Unknown atm x_x

Oh you ~




Nintendo still doomed?
Feel free to add me on 3DS or Switch! (PM me if you do ^-^)
Nintendo ID: Mako91                  3DS code: 4167-4543-6089