And none of you think the other is mafia.

You know mario, I really don't care if you lynch linkz, because if he flips town you will have validated everything I'm saying today, whether or not I'm alive.

Actually, if you look back I did say that FF could be lurking mafia, but it is hard to tell with him. The other two, no, I don't think they are mafia.

And yet you don't go after FF. Sounds like MDJ's way of going about the game.

FF wants Linkz lynched as well.

You guys like all agree with each other, and don't really ask anyone else anything.

Yesterday FF displayed some hesitance about lynching Linkz, asking him how serious he was. Trucks quoted "he's very serious [post reference]."

Trucks answered for linkz, pretty much giving the thumbs up to FF.

I agree with you that FF could likely be scum. Notice that there are 4 people in the list above. Only really 3 of them could be mafia right? So if you're town, try not to get so flustered.

The reverse can also be said. If he flips scum you will have some explaining to do, Prof.

Also, it isn't "me" who will be lynching Linkz, it will be all of us. It takes a majority to lynch someone, not just one person.

There isn't much to go after him on. He isn't doing/ saying anything that stands out as scum. It is just a feeling I have on him. I could say I had a dream that he was scum and then vote for him. Do you think that would work? :P

If they agree with me, then I can't really do anything to change that, but that doesn't mean we are all scum. It really isn't that simple.

Yes, 3 mafia is most likely. I'm not getting flustered, I'm just saying all your points are NOT correct about me.

Yes, I will have some explaining to do. But I don't expect to live that long either.

Plus, I'm just one person who has named 4 people. If linkz flips scum, then I'm in trouble. I don't care. If he flips town, it makes 4 people look bad. I'll take that tradeoff.

That is typical scum play to not stand out...don't say anything to get too much attention. Just lightly comment and put your votes down. Don't start fights. None of these 4 has displayed scumhunting, and you are probably the only one of them who has taken some risks. You SHOULD be asking yourself if you're being played, because the people agreeing with shady as fuck.

It actually is pretty simple. You four share a lot of similarities. None of you are looking at the others or questioning them. I can do quote rundowns if you'd like. None of you have interrogated any of the other 3 outside of once or twice. Who is getting your attention? Linkz, myself, hat, zero, mdj.. but who's putting down votes? you, trucks, yoshi, ff.

All are voting, yet myself and linkz are the ones on the seat. That's typical scapegoating. "It wasn't MY fault, it was linkz and prof." I'm not saying we had nothing to do with Hat being lynched, but if you were mafia, and you saw a mislynch about to happen with another townie leading the charge, you would do the same, right? I'm not trying to get out of responsibility, but I want you to see who is taking advantage of the opportunity.

I would define tunneling as one of the following: 
(1)  Only going after one person you suspect of being scum, to the exclusion of other suspects.  If you consider anyone else it's only slightly, as your attention is 90%+ on the one person; or you only consider others scum in relation to the one person -- "X is scum so this guy might be his scumbuddy". 
(2)  Going after a person to a ridiculous level:  at the most extreme, everything they say and do reinforces your belief they are scum.  If they were to say "X", it would be scummy because blah blah blah.  If they were to say "not X", it would be scummy because blah blah blah.  There is no real doubt in your mind about this person and the only way you could possibly have your certainty shaken is by the spell being broken.  If a cop claimed an innocent scan you would immediately either suspect he was scum or his result was messed up because the target absolutely had to be scum.  (Although a cop scan is one of the things that can break the spell and therefore end this type of tunneling.) 

I was having a definite vibe of type (2) tunneling from you directed at prof at the time I posted "tunnel more". 

I don't recall defending you the day we lynched hatmoza.  Not saying I didn't but if you have evidence handly please do refute. 

I didn't display immediate reluctance to lynch, I only backed off at the last second when Linkz started making me doubt him, and hatmoza's posts started sounding more compelling.  Although in your shoes I'd probably be even more suspicious of people backing off shortly before the lynch went through. 

The claim I'm going to turn on you is pure fiction on your part, and although I make no promises I don't have any plans to go after you tomorrow based on Linkz's flip.  I certainly don't recall saying "you're next" toDay.