TruckOSaurus said: See, that's your analysis of the situation based on how you think. Personally, if I had been a watcher and a very suspicious spurge/hat suddenly claims cop (in a pretty small game), I would have thought "This guy is lying his ass off". I figured Linkz's reaction was spurred by something similar, I trusted him at that point, he gave me guarantees that he wasn't bluffing, how is my vote bad play? |
I would never vote for a claimed cop based on the potentiality of tracker/watcher.
I would for a lie detector, and I would for a cop counterclaim, both of which were the most likely possibilities.
It would also be a weak scum gamble to consider fakeclaiming watcher/tracker or even a combo of both when there is a cop, especially when he will have to explain himself the very next day. Like I said, cop doesn't rule out watcher/tracker. Linkz is more careful than that.
But yes, that is just how I think. However, it doesn't either convince me that you've not done more than take very defensible positions and actions.