If what your saying is true then its weird that we hear studios closing all the time. Not kidding but they seem to be more in vita's part though. 

Why is it so weired for companies to close in the first place? 

Companies close because they aren't successful in all industries, I'm not sure why people would expect the videogame industry to be any different. In fact given that videogames is such a relatively new industry that is rappidly changing it's expected that there will be a lot of companies closing and new ones opening. 

No I don't think you understand resolution works, on a long enough distance even 480p won't be noticeable, I sit 2,5m from my 50" plasma and its definetly not sharp enough. Neither did you seem to understand me, I'll repeat again: retail games won't be 4K but certain PSN games most definetly will.  Phones and tablets are going upwards 400ppi, most people's eyes can't resolve sharpness above 229ppi, its not like our phone displays needed to be HD(or use HD like you put it), they have been sharp enough for years in the first place so the argument of "you cant distnguish pixels now" is rather pointless, if anything higher resolutions than you need on phones are bad for your battery life and performance. When the ps3 came out no one had a 1080p tv, 4K is the next big thing, like it or not. Yes they cost a lot thanks for the obvious but so did the first plasma sets and 1080p tvs.

And i'll repeat again - so few people will own a 4k TV programming a game in 4k is a fucking waste of time.

You also forget that higher resolution = selling point for phones as the average phone owner has no idea what they are buying but "a bigger resolution is better, right?".

You are also completely ignoring the point that 4k TV's are all massive. 60+ inches. For many, many people, that is simply too big. 1080p was about getting the price to come down. As I said, even if 4k comes down in price, the sets are just too big for the vast majority of people.

Please address what I have actually said. You just repeated yourself and ignored my points. 

Ultimately, the issue with 4k is not the price, it's the size, and that won't change over time.

As time passes tech gets cheap.   The only reason why PS360 costs $60 is because publishers needed to make their Wii games appealing.    If a PS3 game costs $50 and a Wii game costs $50, according to you which one people would think that is outrageous to have that price?  So instead of making Wii games cheaper they made PS360 games more expensive.   Think about it, why the same version of a game that is also available for PC costs $50 and not $60??? 

When next gen enters overdrive, it will require less resources to make "previous gen" games, making them cheaper to make; and the "current gen" games will cost just about the same as it is right now.

In theory what you said makes sense. But pratically I don't think this will be the case.

PC high-end games sell  poorly compared to their console counterparts. That's why I believe PC game prices are priced as they are. Making them the same price as console games will do little to improve already weak sales.

For example Crysis is the best selling big budget PC game in the last 6 years with approx. 3m sales and that's huge compared to other high-end PC games. ( Please note I am not including PC role-playing or sims etc., as these are cheap to produce ). Compare that to the console big budget hitters.

History confirms prices don't fall. If regular games cost $70.00 at the start of next gen I believe they will stay that price until the end of the gen  no matter how cheap they are to produce.

I was paying £45-£49 for regular console games at the start of this gen and am paying the same now. Aren't they now easier and cheaper to develope?

Why am I still paying the same now? Why should this change next gen?

Not saying you are wrong, just stating what I think will happen.