By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - Contradiction in Rules...

NintendoPie said:
Hopefully this doesn't turn into what MBP did... making everyone take down NSFW Avatars was just plain evil.



sssttt! Stop talking about that.. Newcomers wont know if we dont talk about it and older members will start forgetting about that incident.. and then very slowly and sneaky sexy avatars will return to this site..



 

Face the future.. Gamecenter ID: nikkom_nl (oh no he didn't!!) 

Around the Network
NiKKoM said:
NintendoPie said:
Hopefully this doesn't turn into what MBP did... making everyone take down NSFW Avatars was just plain evil.



sssttt! Stop talking about that.. Newcomers wont know if we dont talk about it and older members will start forgetting about that incident.. and then very slowly and sneaky sexy avatars will return to this site..

It seems that Trucks is already making this happen... I'll spoiler tag that post. ;P

Edit: Maybe I won't... Spoiler doesn't seem to work...



Am I the only one who supports the decision? This isn't a porn site. I browse this site with others in the room.



Mr Khan said:
Turkish, just get rid of them. They're going to cause more trouble than they're worth, and if that is the point of keeping them around, then that does indeed violate the rules.


Yay, I got to use this again, thanks Smeags!



miz1q2w3e said:
Am I the only one who supports the decision? This isn't a porn site. I browse this site with others in the room.

Are you talking about the banishment of NSFW Avvys? If so, I was only kidding.



Around the Network

Are you suggesting that life isn't fair? You're not going to win that argument.



Currently own:

 

  • Ps4

 

Currently playing: Witcher 3, Walking Dead S1/2, GTA5, Dying Light, Tomb Raider Remaster, MGS Ground Zeros

BasilZero said:
miz1q2w3e said:
Am I the only one who supports the decision? This isn't a porn site. I browse this site with others in the room.

I dont think Turkish's sigs can be considered porn....unless..you know...you are into that kind of stuff D:



:O

The only stuff I'm into, is you.



NintendoPie said:
miz1q2w3e said:
Am I the only one who supports the decision? This isn't a porn site. I browse this site with others in the room.

Are you talking about the banishment of NSFW Avvys? If so, I was only kidding.

Yep :p



BasilZero said:
Mazty said:

 

Why can't we all hold hands under a rainbow regardless of which console sits under your TV? :'(


No one is waging war....against anyone....its just a forum sig showing two popular figures as comedy relief. I for one have Nintendo and Sony systems under my TV/monitor and soon will have a Microsoft system (well technically a PC already...but still xD).

 

Now if the sig had said "Nintendo sucks Sony rulez", then it would be a problem but it doesnt have that nor does it signify that.

You and I can see it as comedic relief. But will everyone? More so with the advent of a new generation on it's way, that tends to create pretty volitile ground (remember 7th gen start? >.< ). Just as a precaution imo it's best to avoid such sigs that show any sort of corporate superiority. It's not hard to imagine someone with such sigs making a valid point in a thread to do with a company and someone replying along the lines of "Well no *** you're a fanboy look at your sig". Now i'm certainly not saying that the latter statement has any truth in it, but just demonstrating how quickly a thread could turn to poop with such sigs. And no one likes poop. 



BasilZero said:
Mazty said:
BasilZero said:
Mazty said:

 

Why can't we all hold hands under a rainbow regardless of which console sits under your TV? :'(


No one is waging war....against anyone....its just a forum sig showing two popular figures as comedy relief. I for one have Nintendo and Sony systems under my TV/monitor and soon will have a Microsoft system (well technically a PC already...but still xD).

 

Now if the sig had said "Nintendo sucks Sony rulez", then it would be a problem but it doesnt have that nor does it signify that.

You and I can see it as comedic relief. But will everyone? More so with the advent of a new generation on it's way, that tends to create pretty volitile ground (remember 7th gen start? >.< ). Just as a precaution imo it's best to avoid such sigs that show any sort of corporate superiority. It's not hard to imagine someone with such sigs making a valid point in a thread to do with a company and someone replying along the lines of "Well no *** you're a fanboy look at your sig". Now i'm certainly not saying that the latter statement has any truth in it, but just demonstrating how quickly a thread could turn to poop with such sigs. And no one likes poop. 

If the moderators/owners of the site deem it to be necessary, let them enforce it - I wouldnt mind one way or another. It doesnt offend me and imo shouldnt offend gamers unless they for some reason are REALLY into the companies as much as the actual games lol...

Oh I agree completely - the sooner that the notion of a favourite company is eradicated from gaming, the better gaming will become in my opinion.