By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - Contradiction in Rules...

bananaking21 on 03 February 2013
Andrespetmonkey said:
If Turkish's sig is enough to "arouse strong emotion" I can't even imagine the breakdown you have after seeing youtube comments. That said, he is breaking the rules... so I hope the mods post here.

how is turkish's sig flaim bait? its kaz saving riggie and trying to pull him away from harms way, its clear he is pulling him away while shooting at balm.... umm the bad guys  



Around the Network
Deyon on 03 February 2013
bananaking21 said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
If Turkish's sig is enough to "arouse strong emotion" I can't even imagine the breakdown you have after seeing youtube comments. That said, he is breaking the rules... so I hope the mods post here.

how is turkish's sig flaim bait? its kaz saving riggie and trying to pull him away from harms way, its clear he is pulling him away while shooting at balm.... umm the bad guys  

Some people see things in a negative way.

Kaz is just trying to save a hungover reggie from a bar fight.



bananaking21 on 03 February 2013
Deyon said:
bananaking21 said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
If Turkish's sig is enough to "arouse strong emotion" I can't even imagine the breakdown you have after seeing youtube comments. That said, he is breaking the rules... so I hope the mods post here.

how is turkish's sig flaim bait? its kaz saving riggie and trying to pull him away from harms way, its clear he is pulling him away while shooting at balm.... umm the bad guys  

Some people see things in a negative way.

Kaz is just trying to save a hungover reggie from a bar fight.

exactly, its clear riggie's body isnt ready there, he just cant handle his drunk self 



Turkish on 03 February 2013
kowenicki said:
Turkish said:
Mazty said:
Turkish said:

He's holding Reggie, not Iwata


I stand corrected, but nevertheless, your sigs are pretty inflammatory:

in·flam·ma·to·ry   (n-flm-tôr, -tr)

 

adj.
1. Arousing passion or strong emotion, especially anger, belligerence, or desire.

 

Personally I'm no longer a console gamer, but still, I can imagine it hasn't helped many times.

 

No its not inflammatory. I don't have such intentions, I know the sig is pretty hilarious. I'm not mocking you nor your gaming preferences. Please don't begrudge a simple sig like that. Why make this thread? Why not send me a pm saying you don't like it?


You didn't. When you didn't like my sig you took it up with the mods.  Don't deny it, I have the email from a mod to prove it.  


What do you mean "you didn't"? Your sig was not allowed, the mod said to ask you first to remove it and if you didn't, to report it. Simply put, I don't care if you flame me in your sig, but if you're allowed to make references, so should I. But then you would complain that I am trolling like the first time I made references to the contreversial reviews.



Sal.Paradise on 03 February 2013
Deyon said:

fixed



Around the Network
brendude13 on 03 February 2013
BasilZero said:

Why would anyone get mad at a sig/avatar making fun of a video game or a corporate person?

I just find it hilarious lol. Although if the mods say take it off then sure.

This is why I don't think it's inflammatory, they're just heads of corporations and gamers don't really have any strong feelings about them. They're just part of memes and jokes about the console wars.

I actually found the GIFs pretty hilarious.



Turkish on 03 February 2013
kowenicki said:
Turkish said:
kowenicki said:
Turkish said:
Mazty said:
Turkish said:

He's holding Reggie, not Iwata


I stand corrected, but nevertheless, your sigs are pretty inflammatory:

in·flam·ma·to·ry   (n-flm-tôr, -tr)

 

adj.
1. Arousing passion or strong emotion, especially anger, belligerence, or desire.

 

Personally I'm no longer a console gamer, but still, I can imagine it hasn't helped many times.

 

No its not inflammatory. I don't have such intentions, I know the sig is pretty hilarious. I'm not mocking you nor your gaming preferences. Please don't begrudge a simple sig like that. Why make this thread? Why not send me a pm saying you don't like it?


You didn't. When you didn't like my sig you took it up with the mods.  Don't deny it, I have the email from a mod to prove it.  


What do you mean "you didn't"? Your sig was not allowed, the mod said to ask you first to remove it and if you didn't, to report it. Simply put, I don't care if you flame me in your sig, but if you're allowed to make references, so should I. But then you would complain that I am trolling like the first time I made references to the contreversial reviews.

My sig was allowed, I changed it due to yor plea.   I also have the email from a mod proving it was ok.  

I also have the emails with a certain mod telling me to ask you to remove it. If you're allowed to make references, I shall too. Lex talionis. You don't get to flame me without expecting anything in return.



NintendoPie on 03 February 2013

Hopefully this doesn't turn into what MBP did... making everyone take down NSFW Avatars was just plain evil.



Mr Khan on 03 February 2013

Turkish, just get rid of them. They're going to cause more trouble than they're worth, and if that is the point of keeping them around, then that does indeed violate the rules.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

brendude13 on 03 February 2013
NintendoPie said:
Hopefully this doesn't turn into what MBP did... making everyone take down NSFW Avatars was just plain evil.

They were only trying to protect you NinPie!

...Ok, and me too.