By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - CD Projekt Red Give First Glimpse of Next-Gen RPG Graphics

ninjablade said:

yes it does, but i have never played the game, it seems to me nintendo fans just want a game to look better then current gen so bad, so anything that looks nice on wii u = better then  current gen or nextgen. i remember reading on neogaf how nintendo fans were saying that multiplatform games on wiiu look better then they are on currentgen consoles, till DF put that to rest.


Trine 2 looks better on Wii U than on last-gen consoles. You can't deny the truth, Wii U hardware is better.



Around the Network
RazorDragon said:
ninjablade said:

yes it does, but i have never played the game, it seems to me nintendo fans just want a game to look better then current gen so bad, so anything that looks nice on wii u = better then  current gen or nextgen. i remember reading on neogaf how nintendo fans were saying that multiplatform games on wiiu look better then they are on currentgen consoles, till DF put that to rest.


Trine 2 looks better on Wii U than on last-gen consoles. You can't deny the truth, Wii U hardware is better.

AC3, BLOPS 2, mass effect 3, dark siders all looks and run better on 360 than on wiiu. You can't deny the truth, 360 hardware is better. why don't you guys go read the wii u techinical dicussion on beyond 3d or neogaf. the truth is wiiu might be 20% weaker or stronger then currentgren, we will know be next week after the gpu tear down.



Mmmmm that's pretty.



Currently own:

 

  • Ps4

 

Currently playing: Witcher 3, Walking Dead S1/2, GTA5, Dying Light, Tomb Raider Remaster, MGS Ground Zeros

irstupid said:
SwansVanTerif said:
Haha, yeah, pretty sure I'm not talking about Dragon Age.

Everything. I feel the exact opposite of you.

Some people also think a game like, for example Saints Row 3, is better than Saints Row 2 in every way, but they are wrong ... in every way.

I would like to know what you thought made Witcher 1 better.

Was it story?

Was it combat?

Was it graphics/art style?

Was it characters?

Was it dialogue?

Was it weapons?

Was it ect?

I'm not trying to say that you can't like Witcher 1 better, I'm just curious what aspects you thought Witcher 1 did better?  Personally I thought Witcher 2 improved on every area I can think of, except possible control style.  I like the combat much more, but the control seemed to be tailored more towards consoles than pc.  Also the UI needed some help.  Again something I felt was fault of being made to be ported to consoles.  Hopefully they don't do that with Witcher 3.


Well, if I really have to say something about it, I'd say that the controls were not good, I didn't like the change in combat style and I thought the first one was a lot more raunchy and silly. It is like yoo said, the second one felt much too much like a console game to me. I wanted it to be just like Witcher, and it wasn't.



ps3-sales! said:
Mmmmm that's pretty.

what is?



Around the Network
ninjablade said:
RazorDragon said:
ninjablade said:

yes it does, but i have never played the game, it seems to me nintendo fans just want a game to look better then current gen so bad, so anything that looks nice on wii u = better then  current gen or nextgen. i remember reading on neogaf how nintendo fans were saying that multiplatform games on wiiu look better then they are on currentgen consoles, till DF put that to rest.


Trine 2 looks better on Wii U than on last-gen consoles. You can't deny the truth, Wii U hardware is better.

AC3, BLOPS 2, mass effect 3, dark siders all looks and run better on 360 than on wiiu. You can't deny the truth, 360 hardware is better. why don't you guys go read the wii u techinical dicussion on beyond 3d or neogaf. the truth is wiiu might be 20% weaker or stronger then currentgren, we will know be next week after the gpu tear down.

Actually, AC3, BLOPS 2, Mass Effect and Darksiders look the same on both consoles, only having lower framerates on the Wii U. CPU dependant games will obviously have problems with the GPGPU design of the Wii U, specially considering that those were launch games.



zero129 said:
ninjablade said:
Barozi said:
ninjablade said:

code x is not even better then currentgen, show me these amazing textures that your talking about, RDR has alpha textures every where and the lighting is dynamic, unlike X which has mostly prepaked and static, please use real facts next time. as for the CDred project, the pic looks nice, nothing amazing but wait till you see it in motion, i'm sure it will blow us away.

Personally I don't think Red Dead looked all that great. Sure in areas, but it was so empty compared to Gta4.

Everybody has an opinion on what looks great or not, but the game was a technical marvel http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5TQDeoump4. the lighting is probably the best in an open world game on consoles.

I'd like to add FFXIII-2 pics (even though the quality could be better):






That's the biggest non-linear level in the game. Looks rather similar doesn't it ?

yes it does, but i have never played the game, it seems to me nintendo fans just want a game to look better then current gen so bad, so anything that looks nice on wii u = better then  current gen or nextgen. i remember reading on neogaf how nintendo fans were saying that multiplatform games on wiiu look better then they are on currentgen consoles, till DF put that to rest.

Well since both of them games are already released and Code X Already beats them in terms of Textures (Watch the video in HD and you will see the is things going on in X that just wouldnt be able to be done on current gen consoles) draw distance, Resolution etc i think its off to a very good start since the game will look even better once its complete.

to the bolded i can play that game too. I guess Sony/MS fans are pretty shocked Nintendo console is getting a game that will look head and shoulders above anything thats on both of them consoles.

Also for you information im not a Nintendo fan if Anything im more a PC Fan (just look at my games collection), who also happens to own and like Nintendo, Sony and MS consoles..


I watched the video and there is no way you can tell tell if the textures are impressive or not from the video, you would need HD direct feed pics to see if the textures are impressive and the game looks sub hd, i can't see anything your talking about and i'm sure you can't prove anything so just stop dude. also this http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=46841825&postcount=836 there is pop up so i don't see how the draw distance is impressive.



zero129 said:
ninjablade said:
zero129 said:

Well since both of them games are already released and Code X Already beats them in terms of Textures (Watch the video in HD and you will see the is things going on in X that just wouldnt be able to be done on current gen consoles) draw distance, Resolution etc i think its off to a very good start since the game will look even better once its complete.

to the bolded i can play that game too. I guess Sony/MS fans are pretty shocked Nintendo console is getting a game that will look head and shoulders above anything thats on both of them consoles.

Also for you information im not a Nintendo fan if Anything im more a PC Fan (just look at my games collection), who also happens to own and like Nintendo, Sony and MS consoles..


I watched the video and there is no way you can tell tell if the textures are impressive or not from the video, you would need HD direct feed pics to see if the textures are impressive and the game looks sub hd, i can't see anything your talking about and i'm sure you can't prove anything so just stop dude. also this http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=46841825&postcount=836 there is pop up so i don't see how the draw distance is impressive.

Clearly it will be a waste of time to argue with you on such things as no matter what i show or say you will just dismiss it anyways, so yeah good look with that. When X launchs and blows away anything on the current gen Consoles i will revive this thread then..

sure your not biased making such claims with out any proof, game has bad IQ, pop up, lighting thats no where near impressive as rdr and its gonna blow away currentgen, LOL.



zero129 said:
ninjablade said:
zero129 said:

Clearly it will be a waste of time to argue with you on such things as no matter what i show or say you will just dismiss it anyways, so yeah good look with that. When X launchs and blows away anything on the current gen Consoles i will revive this thread then..

sure your not biased making such claims with out any proof, game has bad IQ, pop up, lighting thats no where near impressive as rdr and its gonna blow away currentgen, LOL.

Someone that trys to use Neogaf to prove their point i just cant argue with. Btw did you see how much Better Xenoblade looked once it launched compared to how it was when it was first showing??. Yeah same thing will happen here ill just leave it at that..

Code x looks like a ps3 game.....while i will admit it will be a great looking game, it won't be anything special that current  gen console cant do.



We will just have to wait and see once the game launchs


Well i can agree with you on that,  i have seen many games this gen being claimed to be the new graphic king until they come out and have horrible performance or are sub hd, or are full of jaggies, lets wait and see before making claims its nextgen, when even nintendo won't release proper hd pics of the trailer.