So this is what they were working on...

You guys are right, Xenoblade + Monster Hunter. Too bad I'm not really into either of those :B

ninjablade said: dahuman said: ninjablade said: dahuman said: ninjablade said: riderz13371 said: zero129 said: Loving this game, also loving some fans of other consoles trying to downplay how epic this looks, i bet if this was on one of their consoles of choice they would be hyping this game like the is no tomorrow!. And this game is 100% Xenoblade 2 as im pretty sure thats the main character you see at the very end from Xenoblade. Anyway i cant wait for it. And its madness that Monolith can get a great Nextgen looking RPG with a Huge world out like this soo soon and yet we still have nothing from FF Vs13 Or maybe you're overhyping it? It looks amazing and the scale plus draw distance is beautiful but it's not something that I haven't seen before. yup way over hyping, looks at read dead redemption on 360 trailer, its has a huge  scale, better detail and better lighting, can nintendo fans please explain why this is so impressive from a techincal point of view, yes if you comprare to rpgs it looks very impressive but there are hardly any that looked amazing this gen. whoa? The lighting in RR is DX9 level and the lighting I see in X is DX10-11 level with really good details and good FPS, what are you even looking at? watch the video  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7xfXRSABic watch the towrds the end the lighting is just out of this world, just looks so realistic. You can't be serious, I'm a PC gamer and I see a clear difference in the 2, RDR isn't even close, especially on the assets. what assets you talking about. go watch x2 720p at full screen and then get back to me some things look down right pathetic.

I did, look at the environment and character details, how do you even compare the 2? I've been a graphics whore since the early 90s and never have I seen such a ridiculous argument coming from somebody when the difference is this big, WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING AT??!?!?!

If you watch the trailer you'll see there are parts where you play alone (or at least there's no chat thingy), so maybe it's just an online multiplayer option, not necessarily a MMO.

I see Ninjablade is still needs to get a life and stop hating on Nintendo. But then what else will he do? Anyways, it would be nice to see how this compares to FF XIII graphically despite the fact that there is less going on with that game and not as fast paced.

This thread is becoming comic gold, we have people from all sides saying X looks better and one man on a mission to convince us otherwise on RDR.

dahuman said: ninjablade said: dahuman said: ninjablade said: dahuman said: ninjablade said: riderz13371 said: zero129 said: Loving this game, also loving some fans of other consoles trying to downplay how epic this looks, i bet if this was on one of their consoles of choice they would be hyping this game like the is no tomorrow!. And this game is 100% Xenoblade 2 as im pretty sure thats the main character you see at the very end from Xenoblade. Anyway i cant wait for it. And its madness that Monolith can get a great Nextgen looking RPG with a Huge world out like this soo soon and yet we still have nothing from FF Vs13 Or maybe you're overhyping it? It looks amazing and the scale plus draw distance is beautiful but it's not something that I haven't seen before. yup way over hyping, looks at read dead redemption on 360 trailer, its has a huge  scale, better detail and better lighting, can nintendo fans please explain why this is so impressive from a techincal point of view, yes if you comprare to rpgs it looks very impressive but there are hardly any that looked amazing this gen. whoa? The lighting in RR is DX9 level and the lighting I see in X is DX10-11 level with really good details and good FPS, what are you even looking at? watch the video  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7xfXRSABic watch the towrds the end the lighting is just out of this world, just looks so realistic. You can't be serious, I'm a PC gamer and I see a clear difference in the 2, RDR isn't even close, especially on the assets. what assets you talking about. go watch x2 720p at full screen and then get back to me some things look down right pathetic. I did, look at the environment and character details, how do you even compare the 2? I've been a graphics whore since the early 90s and never have I seen such a ridiculous argument coming from somebody when the difference is this big, WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING AT??!?!?!

tell me what the diiffernce, i don't see it, granted the huge mountain was the only thing i saw that looked impressive.

just watched the video, game looks like crap compared RDR and X2.

And plus this game is probably a MMORPG, I wonder how many people still will be exited for this game if they realize that this game is probalbly not the successor of xenoblade in a traditional way, not in the way they hoped. MMOs on consoles are not that awesome normally.

ninjablade said: dahuman said: ninjablade said: dahuman said: ninjablade said: dahuman said: ninjablade said: riderz13371 said: zero129 said: Loving this game, also loving some fans of other consoles trying to downplay how epic this looks, i bet if this was on one of their consoles of choice they would be hyping this game like the is no tomorrow!. And this game is 100% Xenoblade 2 as im pretty sure thats the main character you see at the very end from Xenoblade. Anyway i cant wait for it. And its madness that Monolith can get a great Nextgen looking RPG with a Huge world out like this soo soon and yet we still have nothing from FF Vs13 Or maybe you're overhyping it? It looks amazing and the scale plus draw distance is beautiful but it's not something that I haven't seen before. yup way over hyping, looks at read dead redemption on 360 trailer, its has a huge  scale, better detail and better lighting, can nintendo fans please explain why this is so impressive from a techincal point of view, yes if you comprare to rpgs it looks very impressive but there are hardly any that looked amazing this gen. whoa? The lighting in RR is DX9 level and the lighting I see in X is DX10-11 level with really good details and good FPS, what are you even looking at? watch the video  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7xfXRSABic watch the towrds the end the lighting is just out of this world, just looks so realistic. You can't be serious, I'm a PC gamer and I see a clear difference in the 2, RDR isn't even close, especially on the assets. what assets you talking about. go watch x2 720p at full screen and then get back to me some things look down right pathetic. I did, look at the environment and character details, how do you even compare the 2? I've been a graphics whore since the early 90s and never have I seen such a ridiculous argument coming from somebody when the difference is this big, WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING AT??!?!?! tell me what the diiffernce, i don't see it, granted the huge mountain was the only thing i saw that looked impressive.

Look at the textures, the poly count(both on character and environment+ the monsters), the character details, the actual lighting that I only see in DX10-11 games, I also saw SSAO at certain parts. I think you like RDR better because it looks sharper due to the lack of good AA and that it has a lot of grass but the shadows are generally really blocky since it's based on DX9 tech compared to the more recent Wii U hardware, there is no comparison. Halo 4 would be a much better contender to compare it to and that's nowhere as open while being cel-shaded as well. Just ask anybody else who is a PC graphics whore, they'd also know exactly what I'm talking about.

lo i'm not trying to convince, many nintendo fans think mario galaxy is the best looking game of this gen, i wanna see how people got from a minute of footage that X2 is doing more impressive techincally, so far all i heard is opinions