leatherhat said:
Kasz216 said:
leatherhat said:
Kasz216 said:
kain_kusanagi said: I have no doubt that PSN only games will be supported since they all are lower end games as most are multiplatform anyway. But the bigger retail games could end up being left in the dust is Sony doesn't go with a Cell compatible chip like is rumored. As for me, I always keep my consoles so while I find backwards compatibility convenient it's not a deal breaker because I can always pull out my old system. With that said, there aren't many PS3 exclusives that I've ever felt the need to replay so I'm not sure if I'll even feel the need to go back during the next gen. I'll definitly want to replay games like the Mass Effect and Portal series but I didn't get them on PS3. |
The problem i have is... even well maintained, modern consoles seem to break easy... at least the Sony ones do. (I believe the original Xbox dies pretty easy too right?)
While my Bally Astrocade, Atari, NES and SNES work...
Neither of my PS2's work and my PS1 doesn't work....
I'd be shocked if my Ps3 worked in 4-5 years. .
It's one of my big reasons for shifting to PC gaming.
|
With older consoles you can just emulate everything anyway
|
I could, except i live in a country where for most practical purproses it's illegal...
and where the few legal uses of it like Bleem! get stomped out by countless harrassing lawsuits.
|
I don't know the exact laws but I believe if you own the game you can download a ROM for it legally as a back up. So that takes care of your personal collection.
|
Nope. It used to be that you could make a copy of your own game for a backup, but NOT download one from online.
However, it was later changed that circumventing ANY copy protection is illegal.
So you have a right to own a backup copy, but you can't download it online, nor can you copy it by circumventing any copyright protection.
So unless the game doesn't have ANY Drm emulation is illegal.
The only legal emulation is hardware emulation that plays the original discs at the moment.
Or at least that's how i understand the law.
To put it another way, it's like they passed a law where you own, and have a right to your property in someone elses safe, but there is no legal way to actually force them to open the safe to get your stuff out.