By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Was 911 an inside job?

 

Was it?

No 109 98.20%
 
Total:109
SxyxS on 18 January 2013
DieAppleDie said:
if fire did not cause the fall, what did?
structural damage, bad design, magic?


not bad design.that's for sure and not fire,that's for sure

 

the wtc buildings were build amazingly solid.all the steel beams on the side of the impact were completly destroyed(around 50 yards)but zhe buildings still were solid as a rock.

Only a few steel beams were harmed by a harmless fire,and this fire was small and cold(the more smoke,the colder the fire)and has only affected a few beams.

You can destroy all steam beams on one side and nothing happens,but a little fire on the other side can cause a collaps?was the other side made out of sugar????

nanothermite was the magic(the only thing to melt steel)

you can find videos showing molten steel pouring out of the buildings before they collaps,(kerrosin can't melt steel)

 

 

 



Around the Network
Max King of the Wild on 18 January 2013
zero129 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
zero129 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
zero129 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Gribble said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Gribble said:
I'll post this again because I would love some sort of explanation for what is being said here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfJtsAVoxOA

Please listen to every word



Asked and answered my friend. Especially considering thats not building 7

So those bombs must have been in the twin towers, yes? I think we've made a break through here. Now watch it all.


You're the only one saying bombs here. No break through since you still believe the ridiculous notion that for some reason thousands were involved in a stupid idiotic plot to rig a building with explosive that dont explode but melt through steel just to fly a plane in it to get the owner and media involved and have the owner decided to demo his own building to the fire department to go to war with iraq but not invade iraq first. And on the side have a missle thats as wide and as big as a plane shot at the most secrative buildings in the united states

When did he says Thousands??, i never heared him say that. And like what was said this type of thing wouldnt take that many people.

I must ask you have you read any history books??, have you read about any conspiracy theories that then many years later became conspiracy facts?? such as the USA Government doing Tests on its own people?? Them known about Pearl Harbor before it happened etc etc etc???.

I ask you and please answer this question.. Why wouldnt they do the same things now??



Actors, military men, al quida, clean up crews, demo crew, politicians,,, ect ect maybe not thousand but quite a lot buddy. but whatever, thats the most insightful comment youll get from me.

So pretty much you didnt answer my question at all. I ask you again have you read how the USA Government Done TESTS! on its own people?? Why didnt they stop Pearl Harbor when they knew about it?? and once again what would stop them from doing the same thing now??.

Read the bold please.

Yeah i guess you cant go against hard facts so its better to cherry pick your arguments right??.

I bet if you where around when pearl harbor happened you would be telling people "No way our Government knew about this" etc etc just like you are now dude.

I bet you would tell the people that was saying tests was being done on USA Citizins 2No the is no such thing going on our government would never do such a thing look how many people that would take!!""

Better go and put your head back in the sand dude....

And you better put that tin foil hat on because you are portraying the classic example of a red herring argument



Max King of the Wild on 18 January 2013
DieAppleDie said:
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htm



Just to clarify their official position... they are saying the hottest the building could have gotten is slightly hotter than it's ignition temperature?



Max King of the Wild on 18 January 2013
zero129 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
zero129 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
zero129 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
zero129 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Gribble said:
Max King of the Wild said:
 

 

 

 

?

.

 

 

 

 

Really? except i have facts to back up the government knew about Pearl Harbor and that they where doing tests on USA people, unless you dont think thats true??

Red herrings can be 100% factual... however, they are still a logical fallacy. So sorry, cheerio good sir.



Max King of the Wild on 18 January 2013
zero129 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
zero129 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
zero129 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
zero129 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
zero129 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Gribble said:
Max King of the Wild said:
 

 

 

 

?

.

 

 

 

 

Really? except i have facts to back up the government knew about Pearl Harbor and that they where doing tests on USA people, unless you dont think thats true??

Red herrings can be 100% factual... however, they are still a logical fallacy. So sorry, cheerio good sir.

And on this note people

THREAD CLOSED

Or at least this should be what the mods should be saying by now imo....

Why? because you are incapable of having a discussion using logical rules to support your theory that the government was behind 911?



Around the Network
cyberninja45 on 18 January 2013

It is hard to believe that a government would go through all that trouble, but these things are quite possible.also. Although I have never looked much into either side of the conspiracy or debunk-er theories for 9/11 (just have not been bothered to).

I always remember back on that day when I first saw footage of the building collapsing thinking, I never expected it to fall straight down like that kinda weird, and I was not considering conspiracy back then as it just occurred just thought it was strange (because I used to watch discovery channel alot and there was a show that I liked about controlled building demolitions and yeah it kinda looked the same).
And when I watch the footage today it still looks strange but what do I know about skyscrapers falling I'm just a user on a videogame website



My 3ds friendcode: 5413-0232-9676 (G-cyber)



Max King of the Wild on 18 January 2013
cyberninja45 said:
It is hard to believe that a government would go through all that trouble, but these things are quite possible.also. Although I have never looked much into either side of the conspiracy or debunk-er theories for 9/11 (just have not been bothered to).

I always remember back on that day when I first saw footage of the building collapsing thinking, I never expected it to fall straight down like that kinda weird, and I was not considering conspiracy back then as it just occurred just thought it was strange (because I used to watch discovery channel alot and there was a show that I liked about controlled building demolitions and yeah it kinda looked the same).
And when I watch the footage today it still looks strange but what do I know about skyscrapers falling I'm just a user on a videogame website



except for the fact that the buildings collapsed from the top and not the bottom like the conspiracy theorists suggest the bombs came from.... and the fact the debris the broke off fell faster than the building which provides evidence that the floors were collapsing one at a time offering resistance



Max King of the Wild on 18 January 2013

I see me answering people with facts and ignoring you.



Max King of the Wild on 18 January 2013
zero129 said:
Max King of the Wild said:
I see me answering people with facts and ignoring you.

No i see you ignoring facts and picking who you want to reply too for if you where ignoring me like you say you are well then we wouldnt even be talking right now or for the last few messages where you could of easy answered my question if you wanted.

Here ill give it to you again but i know you wont answer it cos you know if you do it will bring your whole 9/11 thing crashing down on you.

Did the USA Government know about Pearl Harbor before it happened and yet allow it to happen anyway??.

Have the USA Government done tests on its own people??.

If you cant answer them 2 questions i lose all respect for you and this thread then really needs to be closed as the OP has not even writing back to one person!!.



there are different ways to ignore people. one way is to block them out completely. which isnt practical here. the other is to not give them time or critical thought.

As for why I don't respond to you seriously, How can I when you have absolutely nothing useful. Tests and pearl harbor have nothing to do with 9-11. If you want to use them you need set it up with logical premises... which you can't. I repeat again, telling people the truth about 9-11 will not come crashing down on me if i say the government knew about pearl harbor because the truth doesnt fall apart. it's supported by facts which the theories are not



Darth Tigris on 18 January 2013

It's a joke.