sperrico87 said:
A good Christian wouldn't call social services on a child raised by non-religious parents. That is both sinful and wrong, and I don't know any Christians who would do that to someone. To me, this assumption suggests you haven't been around very many Christians. Even with non-religious parents, it is perfectly possible for the child to find God in his own way, and parents being non-religious is totally and completely irrelevant to the upbringing of the child. Secondly, it is highly unlikely that the social services case worker(s) would be religious. It's a government job employing mostly college-educated single women in largely urban areas, thus it is far morely likely the case workers are either Atheist, non-religious, or non-denominational. Lastly, at least in Catholocism, you don't need to be baptised or practicing to be assured you'll get into purgatory or heaven. The way most religions work, people who are unable to join a Christian faith either because they live in a Communist society, or a tribal society with no knowledge of Christianity, they would be judged solely on the way in which they lived, not punished due to their ignorance. They would essentially be given a pass, unless they commited murder or something terrible like that, and had no remorse for their sins. |
You are well aware that the social services scenario was simply made up from the top of my head. It doesn't need to be a likely scenario, all it needed to be was an example where external influences affected a persons future actions, in which case God either would or would not allow those external influences to affect his odds of entering heaven or hell.
Your last paragraph is dealt with in "Result 2" in the OP, where it says that external influences (such as not having the opportunity to choose to follow God) won't be considered.