By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Has the word "Terrorist" Completey Associated itself with the Islamic Faith

badgenome said:
fordy said:

The DHS report even warned of a rise in right-wing extremism. At least two of those ones that you mentioned are a direct result of such a thing, direct scare campaigning by groups looking to drive fear into people, such as "we're becoming a socialist state" or "they're coming for your guns".

Which two, pray tell? The schizo Jared Loughner who didn't even bother to vote in 2010 (you know, the Tea Party's banner year) despite voting in the two previous elections? Joe Stack, whose manifesto was pure Occupy Wall Street? Or maybe Bill Sparkman bought so strongly into anti-government rhetoric that he decided all government workers had to go, starting with himself.

The telling thing is that the media often tiptoes around the views of outspoken jihadists like Nidal Hasan, and despite the (not really) anti-war movement's extreme rhetoric during the Bush years, the media didn't try to pin every random instance of violence on them. But now that the scary conservatives are the ones who are pissed off about being out of power, the media regularly rushes to hang anything around their neck until it's proven otherwise. And once they finally have to admit that there was no link, the damage has already been done and it's an established meme that Jared Loughner was a Sarah Palin fanboy or some such nonsense.

but but but... there's a guy by the name of james holmes that is a member of the tea party. we did a quick google search and found out.



Around the Network
killerzX said:

but but but... there's a guy by the name of james holmes that is a member of the tea party. we did a quicj google search and found out.

JOURNALISM FUCK YEAH!



badgenome said:
fordy said:

The DHS report even warned of a rise in right-wing extremism. At least two of those ones that you mentioned are a direct result of such a thing, direct scare campaigning by groups looking to drive fear into people, such as "we're becoming a socialist state" or "they're coming for your guns".

Which two, pray tell? The schizo Jared Loughner who didn't even bother to vote in 2010 (you know, the Tea Party's banner year) despite voting in the two previous elections? Joe Stack, whose manifesto was pure Occupy Wall Street? Or maybe Bill Sparkman bought so strongly into anti-government rhetoric that he decided all government workers had to go, starting with himself.

The telling thing is that the media often tiptoes around the views of outspoken jihadists like Nidal Hasan, and despite the (not really) anti-war movement's extreme rhetoric during the Bush years, the media didn't try to pin every random instance of violence on them. But now that the scary conservatives are the ones who are pissed off about being out of power, the media regularly rushes to hang anything around their neck until it's proven otherwise. And once they finally have to admit that there was no link, the damage has already been done and it's an established meme that Jared Loughner was a Sarah Palin fanboy or some such nonsense.


The media's search for Tea-Party ties to violence bothers me far less than the media's unwillingess to report on the criminal/violent side of the Occupy Wallstreet movement, G8/G20 protests, or even union protests. If they were searching for motivation for an act and looking at political background as one possibility it would be fine, but it is clear that they're looking to slander one political movement while protecting others for undisclosed reasons; and the most likely reason is they're heavily biased.



Kasz216 said:

Also, whenever I think of terrorists I think of Russians. I blame pretty much all action movies ever.

 

For some reason they kept targeting the United States after Rocky's gret spirit won over the Moscow crowd, ended the cold war and brought down communism.


What you gibbering on about. Everyone knows Superman bought down communism.



State of fear... Fear and the feeling that it is one group against another makes US strong.

Governments and businesses will always try to makes us feel scared for something and let us feel that we can overcome it if well all work hard for it. Should ask your grandparents what they were scared of when they were young. They will talk about stuff like Global cooling (yeah the world getting colder), (no more oil around the year 2000, only having the possiblity to eat meat once a week etc.. can be about anything... in 50 years we are maybe scared about India, sea levels decreasing, etc..



 

Around the Network

It sadly is, but that's not right. Surely shootings count as terrorist acts like bombings do. I think the riots in Northern Ireland currently is terrorism, although the worst of it was in the "troubles" in the 1970's. While, the shootings in America recently or the Nowegian shooting the other year, are also terrorism, it's the same sort of thing as the suicide bombings in Baghdad, that often happen and yet it's only seemingly called terrorism if a Muslim does.



Xbox Series, PS5 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)

'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin

Prediction: Switch 2 will outsell the PS5 by 2030

fordy said:

 

The DHS report even warned of a rise in right-wing extremism. At least two of those ones that you mentioned are a direct result of such a thing, direct scare campaigning by groups looking to drive fear into people, such as "we're becoming a socialist state" or "they're coming for your guns". 

The average american (nor does the politician for that matter) don't even know what socialism is, so how do people come to the conclusion that it will become just that. Just foolish



Xbox Series, PS5 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)

'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin

Prediction: Switch 2 will outsell the PS5 by 2030

I don't know how you guys justify America and Isreal's killing of thousands of innocent people and then posting something like this. Clearly you overlook what christians do and portray what muslims do bigger than they are.

An Indian scholar called Dr. Zakir Naik has explained this in a lecture. You can watch it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utHBJmQIz7g

After watching the video you will know that non-muslims did and do the most terrorism, not the muslims. Watch the video if you want to know the truth.



SpartenOmega117 said:

After watching these latest tragedies occur I couldn't help but notice that no one used the word "terrorist" to describe Lanza. Clearly it was an act of terror and I have no doubt in my mind that if someone from the Middle East had committed those crimes there would be massive sh*tstorm against all of the people who practice the Islamic faith. Do you guys think that word "terrorist" has cometely associated itself with Muslims/brown people/Middle Easterns?

Terrorist acts are usually assigned towards individuals working together in an organized manner to use fear to get what they want politically.  Lanza was more of a criminal element.  I would say that you would be correct in seeing that terrorist is being heavily assigned to Arabs and Muslims at this point.