Mr Khan said:
ninetailschris said:
Mr Khan said:
chocoloco said:
I am worried of a delay on the US working out the fiscal cliff quickly because Beohner (pronounced boner) is still the leader of a largely Republican dominated US House. Though the Democrats have gained ground in the Senate and and retained the White House, the political picture remains the same as it was two years ago. The House has little reason other than the good of the country to cooperate with the President Obama. The last go at this only resulted in a long standing stalemate that pissed off the entire country. My outlook is that the dollar would more likely fall if it is not resolved soon than it is to gain immediately.
|
As far as the Republicans are concerned, the key sticking point is the Norquist Pledge, which a lot of major Republicans and almost all Tea Partiers have signed, declaring that they will never agree to raise government revenues by one cent (that is NO tax rate raises forever, but also NO closures of loopholes or deductions, ever) This makes them fundamentally unable to govern, because even the most hardened fiscal conservative who hasn't signed that lunatic's pledge will now that revenue increases are sometimes necessary.
The point of hope here is that several senate republicans have been seen backing off from the Norquist pledge in the past couple weeks.
|
I'm independent voter. But lately I notice you seem kinda bias towards republicans and believe democrats are here to save the world when there just as bad.
|
You just noticed that?
I'm a social democrat, who occasionally has Marxist-Leninist outbursts calling for various fire and brimstone against the idle classes.
But i think we can agree, objectively, that the Norquist Pledge has been bad for the United States of America.
|
In other times yes...
Currently?
People like to call the Democrats Keynsians... but JMK would of slapped you silly if you claimed we should be raising taxes on anybody now.
Closing the deficit by raising taxes in a very weak economy is an action unsupported by any major economic theory.
It's essentially ignoring all economic research.
Politcians be for Spending cuts, or for no spending cuts and no tax increases.... depending on if you take a long term (Hayek) or short term (Keynes) view at economics.
Being for tax increases is illogical from an economics perspective.
You can make a social justice arguement... but make a social justice arguement.... since the entirity of economic science is against such a position. Keynes, Hayek, Friedman... pretty much EVERY notable historical economist would suggest raising taxes now is a bad idea that will hurt the economy short term and actually decrease revenue.