By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Beautiful Console Graphics Thread (Post your Pics and Vids)

selnor said:

Really?

So you like to disregard DF when it suits your graphics agenda?

I edited my post... DF removed this part of article when it says the best visual ever on console ("on console" was direct related to X360 said in the same sentence).

Read the DF article again.



Around the Network
Aldro said:
selnor said:
ethomaz said:

selnor said:

Leading back to my original statement, Forza absolutely owns the racing genre visuals.

I disagree.

GT5 > Forza 4 > Horizons in graphics terms.

In gameplay, driving physics and AI I put Forza 3 over Forza 4 and Horizons too.

Your aloud to disagree aesthetically. But DF have confirmed Horizon > Forza 4 and GT5 technically. Its the best in its class. 

Artistically you can think what you want.

Same way DF said Halo 4 is technically in with a shout at best visuals ever on console.



Same way metacritic has recognized Halo 4 as an 87 title. Even horizon is in the 80s! Feel free to return when it reaches the class of UC & God of War and manages to keep its 90 number. Atleast epic could save Gears. Its evident that the time put inti the graphics made the game fall short.

Your being rather stupid and very childish in how you view your videogames.

Yes I said that because you are.

Metacritic has recognised Halo 4 as worse than Halo 3 and Reach. News flash. The actual fans of the series recognise Halo 4 as the best campaign and multiplayer Halo ever. So wat sould happen? Should 343i listen to Metacritic? Or listen to the people that actually by their product. 

Have a think. Because your next answer either makes you truly like a 2 year old, or a sound of mind human being. 

GOW is a great franchise. Uncharted imo is not of the same gameplay calibur. Visually great, gameplays weaker. Please sont put UNC next to GOW. Because they arent.



The awards are both critics and readers.
The meta shows what the critics find worth the acclaim. Theyll play more games than you and I ever will and when 105 reviews only have 1 in the 80s -> You know you hit a homerun. I dont expect you of all people to understand that. Halo 3 is the highest meta score on the 360 for an exclusive and thats 94 in 2007! Lol...

And you know the best part? Both of the UC & GoW are technically marvelous. So marvelous that Halo 4s digital foundry even mentions them in it. They say those games shaped this generation!

So whats it gonna be? DF? Meta? "Gamers" aka fans like You and I? Sales where CoD is at top and GT ahead of Forza?

For all im concerned, sales =/= quality and reviewers are humans like myself and yourself. I care about other peoples opinion when I want a genuine input. Hence why I am even on this forum. And you know as well as I do that there are fans lurking at every corner downplaying games. So excuse me if I dont find the remarkability of a high meta score to be nothing short of great stuff.



ethomaz said:

selnor said:

Really?

So you like to disregard DF when it suits your graphics agenda?

I edited my post... DF removed this part of article when it says the best visual ever on console ("on console" was direct related to X360 said in the same sentence).

Read the DF article again.

Technologically speaking, Halo 4 doesn't put a foot wrong throughout the entire eight to nine hour campaign. The enhancements to modelling, lighting and environments are beautiful and play host to some of the most epic gunplay we've experienced on a home console title.

In an era where the likes of Naughty Dog and Sony Santa Monica have defined the graphical state-of-the-art with Uncharted and God of War, Xbox 360 finally has its own shot at the title - and it's a genuinely worthwhile, lavish and occasionally even breathtaking experience.

Read it again and its still plain as day.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-halo-4




selnor said:
Aldro said:
selnor said:
ethomaz said:

selnor said:

Leading back to my original statement, Forza absolutely owns the racing genre visuals.

I disagree.

GT5 > Forza 4 > Horizons in graphics terms.

In gameplay, driving physics and AI I put Forza 3 over Forza 4 and Horizons too.

Your aloud to disagree aesthetically. But DF have confirmed Horizon > Forza 4 and GT5 technically. Its the best in its class. 

Artistically you can think what you want.

Same way DF said Halo 4 is technically in with a shout at best visuals ever on console.



Same way metacritic has recognized Halo 4 as an 87 title. Even horizon is in the 80s! Feel free to return when it reaches the class of UC & God of War and manages to keep its 90 number. Atleast epic could save Gears. Its evident that the time put inti the graphics made the game fall short.

Your being rather stupid and very childish in how you view your videogames.

Yes I said that because you are.

Metacritic has recognised Halo 4 as worse than Halo 3 and Reach. News flash. The actual fans of the series recognise Halo 4 as the best campaign and multiplayer Halo ever. So wat sould happen? Should 343i listen to Metacritic? Or listen to the people that actually by their product. 

Have a think. Because your next answer either makes you truly like a 2 year old, or a sound of mind human being. 

GOW is a great franchise. Uncharted imo is not of the same gameplay calibur. Visually great, gameplays weaker. Please sont put UNC next to GOW. Because they arent.



Resident evil 6 was hated by fans. Guess what, reviewers too. Do you really have a hard time seeing reviewers as gamers and fans too? Isnt that 87 a true testiment of just that? We all know 87 is a great score its not like they said the game sucks. But like most people I see, they are too annoyed at the unlockables in MP and the ordinance drops not to mention the maps! They feel its CoD inspired and dislike that change. Then there are those who felt the SP was short to them and the new enemies were not as fresh as expected. There also was a "been there done that feel" + the constantly motive and goal being get to switch X and activate it. You dont even know whats going on half the time. But naturally those "gamers" who love it are the fans that refuse to see flaws and to realise Combat Evolved was much more of a hit when it came and that Halo 4 jusmt isnt there. I know this because I am the same way. So pardon me but Ethomaz isnt the only child here. You and I, we are one as well.



Around the Network

selnor said: 

Technologically speaking, Halo 4 doesn't put a foot wrong throughout the entire eight to nine hour campaign. The enhancements to modelling, lighting and environments are beautiful and play host to some of the most epic gunplay we've experienced on a home console title.

In an era where the likes of Naughty Dog and Sony Santa Monica have defined the graphical state-of-the-art with Uncharted and God of War, Xbox 360 finally has its own shot at the title - and it's a genuinely worthwhile, lavish and occasionally even breathtaking experience.

Read it again and its still plain as day.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-halo-4


So I have reading comprehension problems because I really think DF is saying finally 360 have you own state-of-the-art game but in I can't found when the article says Halo 4 is the best graphics on consoles because the article seems to say Uncharted 3 and God of War III is yet the graphics king.

DF never said what you think they said.



And to add to the top^

The fact that you cant even realize it is what amuses me the most.

Selnor, can you answer a question of mine legitimately?

Brace yourself because here it is:
Do you consider yourself biased in the slightest?

I wont even respond but please answer. Let VGChartz see the answer.



Aldro said:
selnor said:
Aldro said:
selnor said:
ethomaz said:

selnor said:

Leading back to my original statement, Forza absolutely owns the racing genre visuals.

I disagree.

GT5 > Forza 4 > Horizons in graphics terms.

In gameplay, driving physics and AI I put Forza 3 over Forza 4 and Horizons too.

Your aloud to disagree aesthetically. But DF have confirmed Horizon > Forza 4 and GT5 technically. Its the best in its class. 

Artistically you can think what you want.

Same way DF said Halo 4 is technically in with a shout at best visuals ever on console.



Same way metacritic has recognized Halo 4 as an 87 title. Even horizon is in the 80s! Feel free to return when it reaches the class of UC & God of War and manages to keep its 90 number. Atleast epic could save Gears. Its evident that the time put inti the graphics made the game fall short.

Your being rather stupid and very childish in how you view your videogames.

Yes I said that because you are.

Metacritic has recognised Halo 4 as worse than Halo 3 and Reach. News flash. The actual fans of the series recognise Halo 4 as the best campaign and multiplayer Halo ever. So wat sould happen? Should 343i listen to Metacritic? Or listen to the people that actually by their product. 

Have a think. Because your next answer either makes you truly like a 2 year old, or a sound of mind human being. 

GOW is a great franchise. Uncharted imo is not of the same gameplay calibur. Visually great, gameplays weaker. Please sont put UNC next to GOW. Because they arent.



Resident evil 6 was hated by fans. Guess what, reviewers too. Do you really have a hard time seeing reviewers as gamers and fans too? Isnt that 87 a true testiment of just that? We all know 87 is a great score its not like they said the game sucks. But like most people I see, they are too annoyed at the unlockables in MP and the ordinance drops not to mention the maps! They feel its CoD inspired and dislike that change. Then there are those who felt the SP was short to them and the new enemies were not as fresh as expected. There also was a "been there done that feel" + the constantly motive and goal being get to switch X and activate it. You dont even know whats going on half the time. But naturally those "gamers" who love it are the fans that refuse to see flaws and to realise Combat Evolved was much more of a hit when it came and that Halo 4 jusmt isnt there. I know this because I am the same way. So pardon me but Ethomaz isnt the only child here. You and I, we are one as well.

Everyting you mention is why the fans love Halo 4. Again making some of the reviews worrysome. But it does not matter. The fans are playing more hours of Halo 4 than any Halo ever. They like it more and that is what I hope 343 i listen to. Not some of the terrible reviews that wanted it to be more like COD.

The fans of Halo have spoken loudly. We love Halo 4 more than the other Halos. Its better in everyway. 

Also DF is based on facts not opinions.



If you realised what I said, you wouldnt even have bothered to write that. Can you answwr the question now? Dont ignore it. Do you consider yourself to be biased towards any console?



selnor said:
ethomaz said:

selnor said:

Really?

So you like to disregard DF when it suits your graphics agenda?

I edited my post... DF removed this part of article when it says the best visual ever on console ("on console" was direct related to X360 said in the same sentence).

Read the DF article again.

Technologically speaking, Halo 4 doesn't put a foot wrong throughout the entire eight to nine hour campaign. The enhancements to modelling, lighting and environments are beautiful and play host to some of the most epic gunplay we've experienced on a home console title.

In an era where the likes of Naughty Dog and Sony Santa Monica have defined the graphical state-of-the-art with Uncharted and God of War, Xbox 360 finally has its own shot at the title - and it's a genuinely worthwhile, lavish and occasionally even breathtaking experience.

Read it again and its still plain as day.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-halo-4


halo 4 hasnt changed anything. its not even the best looking 360 game, never mind the best looking console game. gears of war 3 is still xbox 360s best looking game. either way, neither halo 4 or gears 3 look anywhere near as good as ps3's best looking exclusives which are quite old now. this thread is proof. look at the pictures.