By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Halo 4 Review Thread! Embargo Lifts on Thurdays 1st November!

Are people seriously saying 90 metacritic is low? Now that's just ridiculous...



Nintendo and PC gamer

Around the Network

Yeah thats kind of what I was saying earlier. People get too caught up in review scores

I love resident evil 6 and that bombed on many reviews. Halo 4 getting a 98 Meta or a 90 Meta makes no difference to me. Especially considering reviews this year are trending down.

Not to mention reviewers are finicky nastards a lot of the time. The lower ended Halo 4 reviews claim that it needs to change more but then the same reviewers destroyed Resident Evil for changing too much.



PolskiLive.pl - 95/100

http://polskilive.pl/recenzja/halo-4-recenzja/

 

Score is here: http://polskilive.pl/category/recenzja/



I can feel it, I can smell it. The rage of Halo and MS fanboys alike

"90 META?! That's fucking bullshit? How the fuck did that interactive movie uncharted 3 get 92 and that fairy on nintendo get a 93? these reviewers are so useless, bleh bleh bleh bleh blah."

It's lovely to see this happen to must AAA games. I can't even imagine what will happen if it hits and stays in the upper 80s.

Moderated,

-Mr Khan



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian

JustThatGamer said:
BenVTrigger said:
Really no one expected 90 or a little lower?

I certainly did and Im a gigantic Halo fan. This has the lowest reviewed year Ive almost ever seen. Once I saw how bad Resident Evil 6 and AC3:got hammered by some reviewers I knew anything over 93 was out of the question. I still cant believe Mass Effect 3 is the highest reviewed game this year.

Pretty much to get anything over 92 at this point in the generation you have to do something MAJOR revolutionaty. God Of War wont get it next year, Gears of War wont do it next year. Beyond and The Last of Us have a slight chance as both are new IP which reviewers seem to be a little more leniant on just look at Dishonored bloated review score.


A lot of people just expected too much from Halo 4, still it won't go below 90% which is a great score. A lot of games are being more harshly criticised this year but it doesn't seem unfair, reading some reviews on AC3 or RE6 justify their mixed/bad scores and what's hard to believe about Mass Effect 3 being the most acclaimed game this year? A vocal bunch of fans hated the original endings but most people think the game as a whole is brilliant. It's my personal GOTY, which might not mean much since this is the worst year this generation in my opinion.

I don't think you need to do something revolutionary to achieve a really high average, if a game's truly good it will score very well. God of War: Ascension will probably score over 92% due to the fact God of War III did and the new game is going to be improved in every aspect, new multiplayer component to shut up critics crying for replayabilty and by the time of release it will be 3 years since the last entry so it'll feel fresh. Gears of War: Judgement definitely won't as Gears of War 3 couldn't, it's from a different developer and it's releasing too soon which some critics will complain about. Beyond: Two souls probably won't either as it'll have some critics slating it for being more a movie than a game like what happened with Heavy Rain. The Last of Us probably won't either as Uncharted 3 couldn't and people's expectations are way too high for the game, unless it is virtually flawless (which is unlikely) people are going to be disappointed. 

Regardless of how harshly or not the games are reviewed next year I do believe 2013 will be the best and last year of this console generation, so many guaranteed to be brilliant classics are coming.

Wow you really think Ascensions gonna be that good?

I played it today in Gamex by the way (swedish game convention) :P. The SP not the MP. It felt pretty good!



Around the Network
smroadkill15 said:
Aldro said:
I just think it implies that Halo needs to redefine more. Gamereactor that gave Halo 1-3 a 10/10 gave Halo 4 a 9 saying despite being great, it needs to innovate/surprise people and he felt 343 played it safe.

90 meta is great. Sure compared to like all of the 360 titles, its the lowest. It had too much hype i believe too since the year was a bit lackluster. People mightve expected more. I know I predicted like 93-96.

Anyhow this whole "its the best halo" or "a 90 now is 96 a few years back" is a bit too much. How about we wait until we played it? Best halo is very possible but ive never truly been a big fan like most here. As for critics being harsh: we had like 2 games get 96 last year! Anyway, i think it can hold 90-91. Damn shame if it drops to 89 lol. I know its "just a number" but still.

You were overhyping it more than anyone lol. Most halo fans, like myself were more realistic say 90-93 at most. This is the 4th installment in a franchise, how many games in there 4th continuely go up in score? I'm just excited to play the game and I could give a rats ass if t score 90 or 98.     

Sure but yeah, I was very much caught up in the hype. We had a thread predicting GOTY swarm and like what 93+ meta? We had Selnor saying it could reach insane heights due to some quotes in a video (but thats just Selnor being himself <3). And yeah I had been too much on GAF xD.

Still though, the game looks SO much better than Reach. And that game scored 91 like two years back. I just figured it'd be higher. Live and learn.



Also would like to add that 90-98 makes no difference to YOU. But in general, one wants to see their favourite franchise and developer be recieved well. I know I died a little inside of joy when Uncharted 2 got 96 and bombarded with awards. Like I wasn't alone in loving the game beyond a lot and ND eventually was able to split in two teams and seems like getting much more freedom from Sony. Its just ..what you want. Its a shame scores have that influence, we can really just accept it. Its not in our hands.

But by no means does it mean anything to you as a individual. I wont enjoy a game any less were it to be 60 meta or 90 meta. Either its shit or its good in my mind. But like mentioned: We are rather dedicated about games and discuss them nearly as much as we play! We just care too much.



sales2099 said:
Currently at 90. Now im nervous. Now we got thousands of PS fans waiting on the edge of their seats....ready to pounce when they see a 89......

It deserves at least 90, which isnt too big a hope given the franchise pedigree

Don't worry man, its likely to climb to 91 again. Even if down to 89, we are only talking +-1. It doesnt mean anything and anyone claiming "ROFL 89" is just retarded.



Lol I knew that 90 score would cause an uproar. This site hasn't changed one bit.



Mummelmann said:

And now people will start to yell and curse because the metascore is "low"... What has this generation done to us as gamers? A domestic site gave it 4/6 (Pressfire.no) and the commentary field below is littered with enraged fans shouting how useless the reviewer is and citing the many high scores it has gotten from the largest mainstream sites (who mostly aren't aware that there are scores below 9.5 for blockbuster titles) rather than read the review and respond to his criticism in a productive manner.

And this has happened so many times this generation with many games across all platforms. Why do people care so damn much about metacritic scores?! A lot of my favorite games have "poor" metascores, all the way down to 85 and even lower, I should really start complaining loudly about it since I feel that they deserve more. I could understand the ruckass if we were talking about a surprising 75/100 metascore, but this is the upper 10th percentile we're talking about here, waaaaay into elite territory. If 90 is "harsh" nowadays, I don't think I can ever take metascores seriously at all any more.

Keep playing your favorite games and enjoy them and stop obsessing over what others think of said games.