Are people seriously saying 90 metacritic is low? Now that's just ridiculous...
Nintendo and PC gamer

Are people seriously saying 90 metacritic is low? Now that's just ridiculous...
Nintendo and PC gamer

Yeah thats kind of what I was saying earlier. People get too caught up in review scores
I love resident evil 6 and that bombed on many reviews. Halo 4 getting a 98 Meta or a 90 Meta makes no difference to me. Especially considering reviews this year are trending down.
Not to mention reviewers are finicky nastards a lot of the time. The lower ended Halo 4 reviews claim that it needs to change more but then the same reviewers destroyed Resident Evil for changing too much.
PolskiLive.pl - 95/100
http://polskilive.pl/recenzja/halo-4-recenzja/
Score is here: http://polskilive.pl/category/recenzja/
I can feel it, I can smell it. The rage of Halo and MS fanboys alike
"90 META?! That's fucking bullshit? How the fuck did that interactive movie uncharted 3 get 92 and that fairy on nintendo get a 93? these reviewers are so useless, bleh bleh bleh bleh blah."
It's lovely to see this happen to must AAA games. I can't even imagine what will happen if it hits and stays in the upper 80s.
Moderated,
-Mr Khan
JustThatGamer said:
I don't think you need to do something revolutionary to achieve a really high average, if a game's truly good it will score very well. God of War: Ascension will probably score over 92% due to the fact God of War III did and the new game is going to be improved in every aspect, new multiplayer component to shut up critics crying for replayabilty and by the time of release it will be 3 years since the last entry so it'll feel fresh. Gears of War: Judgement definitely won't as Gears of War 3 couldn't, it's from a different developer and it's releasing too soon which some critics will complain about. Beyond: Two souls probably won't either as it'll have some critics slating it for being more a movie than a game like what happened with Heavy Rain. The Last of Us probably won't either as Uncharted 3 couldn't and people's expectations are way too high for the game, unless it is virtually flawless (which is unlikely) people are going to be disappointed. Regardless of how harshly or not the games are reviewed next year I do believe 2013 will be the best and last year of this console generation, so many guaranteed to be brilliant classics are coming. |
Wow you really think Ascensions gonna be that good?
I played it today in Gamex by the way (swedish game convention) :P. The SP not the MP. It felt pretty good!








smroadkill15 said:
You were overhyping it more than anyone lol. Most halo fans, like myself were more realistic say 90-93 at most. This is the 4th installment in a franchise, how many games in there 4th continuely go up in score? I'm just excited to play the game and I could give a rats ass if t score 90 or 98. |
Sure but yeah, I was very much caught up in the hype. We had a thread predicting GOTY swarm and like what 93+ meta? We had Selnor saying it could reach insane heights due to some quotes in a video (but thats just Selnor being himself <3). And yeah I had been too much on GAF xD.
Still though, the game looks SO much better than Reach. And that game scored 91 like two years back. I just figured it'd be higher. Live and learn.








Also would like to add that 90-98 makes no difference to YOU. But in general, one wants to see their favourite franchise and developer be recieved well. I know I died a little inside of joy when Uncharted 2 got 96 and bombarded with awards. Like I wasn't alone in loving the game beyond a lot and ND eventually was able to split in two teams and seems like getting much more freedom from Sony. Its just ..what you want. Its a shame scores have that influence, we can really just accept it. Its not in our hands.
But by no means does it mean anything to you as a individual. I wont enjoy a game any less were it to be 60 meta or 90 meta. Either its shit or its good in my mind. But like mentioned: We are rather dedicated about games and discuss them nearly as much as we play! We just care too much.








| sales2099 said: Currently at 90. Now im nervous. Now we got thousands of PS fans waiting on the edge of their seats....ready to pounce when they see a 89...... It deserves at least 90, which isnt too big a hope given the franchise pedigree |
Don't worry man, its likely to climb to 91 again. Even if down to 89, we are only talking +-1. It doesnt mean anything and anyone claiming "ROFL 89" is just retarded.








Lol I knew that 90 score would cause an uproar. This site hasn't changed one bit.
| Mummelmann said: And now people will start to yell and curse because the metascore is "low"... What has this generation done to us as gamers? A domestic site gave it 4/6 (Pressfire.no) and the commentary field below is littered with enraged fans shouting how useless the reviewer is and citing the many high scores it has gotten from the largest mainstream sites (who mostly aren't aware that there are scores below 9.5 for blockbuster titles) rather than read the review and respond to his criticism in a productive manner. |

