By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - 2nd debate, who won? Obama or Romney?

 

Who won the 2nd debate?

President Barack Obama 299 57.72%
 
Governor MItt Romney 149 28.76%
 
Nobody/tie 70 13.51%
 
Total:518
Laurel Aitken on 16 October 2012
killerzX said:
theprof00 said:
killerzX said:
spaceguy said:
killerzX said:
JGarret said:
Can´t wait to see Foxnews´ tears about Candy calling out Romney.

you do realize she was wrong. obama didnt call it a terrorist attack in the rose garden. in fact in the days following attack he kept mention the video as the reason. he went on shows with joy behar, univision, etc. saying it was the video.

so candy was wrong. also its not her job to interject, or add her own "fact checking"


He said it was a terror act. SO you are wrong.

 

that is simply a lie. he did not, and it wouldnt make any sense if he did because he in the following days said it was a demonstration caused by a video, he sent out susan rice to claim it was a demonstration caused by a video. if he thought it was a terror attack, and admitted to it, why did they then go out a claim it was because a video for weeks following.

what you said is flat out wrong.

His exact words were:

""No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done."

And the republicans are pretending like candy falsely corrected romney. HAHAHAHAHAH
He specifically it!
It's like the republicans can't read! HAH


exactly so you agree with me. he didnt call it an act of terror. he said acts of terror wont shake our resolve" soo, he just saying acts of terror wont shake us. he wasnt calling the bengazi thing a terrorist attack.

He went on talk show the days after and flat out refused to call it a terrorist attack. his adminastation blamed the video. i cant believe you guys are actually debating this fact. if he did call it a terror attack in the rose garden, why did he then back track and give out a complete opposite claim


So when he said "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for" on the Libya attacks speech, he waasn't refering to that atack. Umm, you are a smart man my friend. 



Around the Network
killerzX on 16 October 2012
theprof00 said:
killerzX said:
spaceguy said:
killerzX said:
spaceguy said:
killerzX said:
JGarret said:
Can´t wait to see Foxnews´ tears about Candy calling out Romney.

you do realize she was wrong. obama didnt call it a terrorist attack in the rose garden. in fact in the days following attack he kept mention the video as the reason. he went on shows with joy behar, univision, etc. saying it was the video.

so candy was wrong. also its not her job to interject, or add her own "fact checking"


He said it was a terror act. SO you are wrong.

 

that is simply a lie. he did not, and it wouldnt make any sense if he did because he in the following days said it was a demonstration caused by a video, he sent out susan rice to claim it was a demonstration caused by a video. if he thought it was a terror attack, and admitted to it, why did they then go out a claim it was because a video for weeks following.

what you said is flat out wrong.



I forget you believe everything fox news says. Why did I even comment on your post. It's pointless. You have no clue.

what did fox news say? 

i have listened to what obama said in the rose garden, i have the transcript. he did not say it was a terror attack. and if he had said that, why would he latter contridict himself a say it was a demonstration caused by a video. why did he send out Rice to say the same.

you are lying

Our job isn't to tell you why what happened. You are being told to believe something and you are choosing to believe it. I don't know everything concerning the events you are saying specifically happened, but here we have specifics.

Romney said he waited to call it an act of terror. Obama said it the day after it happened. Obama also said tonight that he had investigators sent out to find out what happened. Somewhere in there Rice fits in, and somewhere in there the video fits in, but facts are facts. He said it, and for some reason, another person said it was a demonstration. It's not our job to tell you what caused that statement to be changed. Your media stations job is to make you believe that it is a contradiction, but so far I see this line of history.

The act happens. Obama calls it an act of terror. He sends out investigators to find out what happened exactly. Days later, Rice says it was a demonstration.

Maybe someone is lying, maybe someone is just wrong, but it's quite a leap to go and say 1, that Obama never said something that he did, and 2, say that he's a hypocritie, or saying contradictory things because his investigator and himself are different people.


dear Lord, you event admit to not having the facts. so why are you commenting. he didnt call it a terror attack. in fact flat out refused, he went on numerous shows, when acked by reporters, he and his administration blamed the video.

and im specifically talking about obama himself going on those shows



killerzX on 16 October 2012
theprof00 said:
killerzX said:


exactly so you agree with me. he didnt call it an act of terror. he said acts of terror wont shake our resolve" soo, he just saying acts of terror wont shake us. he wasnt calling the bengazi thing a terrorist attack.

He went on talk show the days after and flat out refused to call it a terrorist attack. his adminastation blamed the video. i cant believe you guys are actually debating this fact. if he did call it a terror attack in the rose garden, why did he then back track and give out a complete opposite claim

Crazy republicans all think the worst of Obama.
It was a pleasure speakign with you, as always.


me, a republican?



theprof00 on 16 October 2012
killerzX said:


dear Lord, you event admit to not having the facts. so why are you commenting. he didnt call it a terror attack. in fact flat out refused, he went on numerous shows, when acked by reporters, he and his administration blamed the video.

and im specifically talking about obama himself going on those shows

So he refers to it as an act of terror that wouldn't shake our resolve, sends out investigators, next few days he refuses to call it a terror attack, and suggests a demonstration.

 

Sounds to me like he jumped to conclusions, then sent out experts, and in the course of sending out the experts, and the experts returning with information, he changed his mind.

Yep, total contradiction, I understand now.



killerzX on 16 October 2012
Laurel Aitken said:
killerzX said:
theprof00 said:
killerzX said:
spaceguy said:
killerzX said:
JGarret said:
Can´t wait to see Foxnews´ tears about Candy calling out Romney.

you do realize she was wrong. obama didnt call it a terrorist attack in the rose garden. in fact in the days following attack he kept mention the video as the reason. he went on shows with joy behar, univision, etc. saying it was the video.

so candy was wrong. also its not her job to interject, or add her own "fact checking"


He said it was a terror act. SO you are wrong.

 

that is simply a lie. he did not, and it wouldnt make any sense if he did because he in the following days said it was a demonstration caused by a video, he sent out susan rice to claim it was a demonstration caused by a video. if he thought it was a terror attack, and admitted to it, why did they then go out a claim it was because a video for weeks following.

what you said is flat out wrong.

His exact words were:

""No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done."

And the republicans are pretending like candy falsely corrected romney. HAHAHAHAHAH
He specifically it!
It's like the republicans can't read! HAH


exactly so you agree with me. he didnt call it an act of terror. he said acts of terror wont shake our resolve" soo, he just saying acts of terror wont shake us. he wasnt calling the bengazi thing a terrorist attack.

He went on talk show the days after and flat out refused to call it a terrorist attack. his adminastation blamed the video. i cant believe you guys are actually debating this fact. if he did call it a terror attack in the rose garden, why did he then back track and give out a complete opposite claim


So when he said "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for" on the Libya attacks speech, he waasn't refering to that atack. Umm, you are a smart man my friend. 

he wasnt. he wasnt calling the attack a terror attack. watch the video and the context of it. that is not calling it a terror attack. FACT at least six times after that speech he denied it was a terror attack. he blaimed the video. 



Around the Network
theprof00 on 16 October 2012
killerzX said:
theprof00 said:
killerzX said:


exactly so you agree with me. he didnt call it an act of terror. he said acts of terror wont shake our resolve" soo, he just saying acts of terror wont shake us. he wasnt calling the bengazi thing a terrorist attack.

He went on talk show the days after and flat out refused to call it a terrorist attack. his adminastation blamed the video. i cant believe you guys are actually debating this fact. if he did call it a terror attack in the rose garden, why did he then back track and give out a complete opposite claim

Crazy republicans all think the worst of Obama.
It was a pleasure speakign with you, as always.


me, a republican?

What?

I didn't say crazy republican. I said crazy republicans all think the worst" soo, I was just saying Republicans hate Obama. I wasn't calling you a crazy republican.



the_dengle on 16 October 2012
killerzX said:


exactly so you agree with me. he didnt call it an act of terror. he said acts of terror wont shake our resolve" soo, he just saying acts of terror wont shake us. he wasnt calling the bengazi thing a terrorist attack.

You are being ridiculous. Why would he suddenly bring up acts of terror if he did not consider the attack itself an act of terror? It would be a total non sequitur. Like talking about the embassy attack and suddenly saying, "and the deer population in the tristate area is completely out of control." You expect us to believe that he simply felt like making a point about acts of terror even though he didn't think the situation had anything to do with terror? Stop being dumb. You can dislike Obama as much as you want, but at least be honest with yourself about the words coming out of the guy's mouth.



kitler53 on 16 October 2012

so i just wanted to post how impressively worked up my wife is on the "binders full of women" statement.  she posted this to her facebook...



TruckOSaurus on 16 October 2012
theprof00 said:
How are you different from George Bush?
George Bush and myself are different people.
I have a five point plan.

He could have answered "I know how to pronounce nuclear"



Signature goes here!

gergroy on 16 October 2012

CNN poll results are in

Obama 46%
Romney 39%

close, but Obama takes it slightly