Laurel Aitken said:
killerzX said:
theprof00 said:
killerzX said:
spaceguy said:
killerzX said:
JGarret said:
Can´t wait to see Foxnews´ tears about Candy calling out Romney. |
you do realize she was wrong. obama didnt call it a terrorist attack in the rose garden. in fact in the days following attack he kept mention the video as the reason. he went on shows with joy behar, univision, etc. saying it was the video.
so candy was wrong. also its not her job to interject, or add her own "fact checking"
|
He said it was a terror act. SO you are wrong.
|
that is simply a lie. he did not, and it wouldnt make any sense if he did because he in the following days said it was a demonstration caused by a video, he sent out susan rice to claim it was a demonstration caused by a video. if he thought it was a terror attack, and admitted to it, why did they then go out a claim it was because a video for weeks following.
what you said is flat out wrong.
|
His exact words were:
""No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done."
And the republicans are pretending like candy falsely corrected romney. HAHAHAHAHAH
He specifically it!
It's like the republicans can't read! HAH
|
exactly so you agree with me. he didnt call it an act of terror. he said acts of terror wont shake our resolve" soo, he just saying acts of terror wont shake us. he wasnt calling the bengazi thing a terrorist attack.
He went on talk show the days after and flat out refused to call it a terrorist attack. his adminastation blamed the video. i cant believe you guys are actually debating this fact. if he did call it a terror attack in the rose garden, why did he then back track and give out a complete opposite claim
|
So when he said "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for" on the Libya attacks speech, he waasn't refering to that atack. Umm, you are a smart man my friend.
|
he wasnt. he wasnt calling the attack a terror attack. watch the video and the context of it. that is not calling it a terror attack. FACT at least six times after that speech he denied it was a terror attack. he blaimed the video.
