theprof00 said:
Our job isn't to tell you why what happened. You are being told to believe something and you are choosing to believe it. I don't know everything concerning the events you are saying specifically happened, but here we have specifics. Romney said he waited to call it an act of terror. Obama said it the day after it happened. Obama also said tonight that he had investigators sent out to find out what happened. Somewhere in there Rice fits in, and somewhere in there the video fits in, but facts are facts. He said it, and for some reason, another person said it was a demonstration. It's not our job to tell you what caused that statement to be changed. Your media stations job is to make you believe that it is a contradiction, but so far I see this line of history. The act happens. Obama calls it an act of terror. He sends out investigators to find out what happened exactly. Days later, Rice says it was a demonstration. Maybe someone is lying, maybe someone is just wrong, but it's quite a leap to go and say 1, that Obama never said something that he did, and 2, say that he's a hypocritie, or saying contradictory things because his investigator and himself are different people. |
dear Lord, you event admit to not having the facts. so why are you commenting. he didnt call it a terror attack. in fact flat out refused, he went on numerous shows, when acked by reporters, he and his administration blamed the video.
and im specifically talking about obama himself going on those shows







