As somebody who is working to overcome my own homosexual desires, it is right.

NolSinkler said:
Homosexuality is the result of deep-rooted confusion about the proper role of self and others in society and in relationship to one another. Confusion implies that a person does not know who s/he is. If a person is confident that he's attracted to the same sex, then there is no confusion. 

It is a condition that cannot persist through time, prevents the continuation of a species , degrades proper moral and intellectual development, and destroys the body. This being said, we should not curse the homosexual, for he is gravely confused and holds many falsehoods true; we should not hurt the homosexual, even though he hurts himself and those around him; rather, we must renounce that which is falsehood in his life and help him to overcome his disordered (not properly ordered) desires.

This entire paragraph is irrelevant. We are looking for the causes of homosexuality, not the effects.

It has been plainly seen for millennia by the the vast majority of mankind that homosexuality is disordered and is something to be repressed and destroyed by society (which implies that it must be repressed and destroyed at an individual level as well). We know that repression and destruction implies pain and suffering - but if we destroy that which is evil, do we not do well? Which is not to say that the person with such desires must be destroyed. On the contrary, we must prevent him from destroying himself.

This entire paragraph is irrelevant. We are looking for the causes of homosexuality, not whether it is evil.

What gives rise to the homosexual movement in our society today? It is the outcome of numerous factors. Male-female relationships have become overtly sexual, and male-female relations which are not extremely sexual are seen today as 'less than' a normal, functioning relationship. Now, the homosexual is such a one that will have trouble functioning in a heterosexual relationship - but in times past, such relationships were not based on sex, but were based on commitment, contracts, and other such devices. And so today, the homosexual has a great deal of trouble finding a suitable wife, because he is told that the ideal partner must be sexually attractive before all else. This is a lie that has crept into our society.

This does not explain the cause of homosexuality. It instead hints at the development the homosexual 'movement,' but still doesn't present any causes for homosexuality in the first place. While more relevant than your other paragraphs, this one is still, ultimately, irrelevant.

So when we seek to conquer the homosexual problem of today, in such a way that the homosexual can be liberated from the tyranny of his disordered sexual desires, we must look at the heterosexual relationship first, which has been distorted and has become the model for the homosexual relationship. For you see, a correct heterosexual relationship has as a component sex, for a purpose, but does not has as its main purpose sex. The 'homosexual' person believes, truly or falsely, that intercourse with a member of the opposite sex will not be as satisfying as with a member of the same sex, and therefore, that this precludes them from any successful heterosexual relationship. Unfortunately, in our society, this is true.

This paragraph is irrelevant. This thread is not meant to determine how we can conquer the homosexual 'agenda.'

And so we see that the problem in our society does not rest on the homosexual, but rests on the heterosexual members of our society, who, understanding and perpetuating a false ideal of a proper heterosexual relationship, have forced others to believe themselves inadequate for a heterosexual relationship, pushing them into the homosexual relationship. Seeing then that the problem is actually the offspring of false ideas in the majority of the population, we must strive to correct these ideals, in doing so, correcting the homosexual problem. For the homosexual understands he has a problem - they know they do not conform to the heterosexual norm - and so they have sought to change the norm, but they have done so in the wrong way, and so have continued to push society in the same direction that it was already headed, which is, toward even greater sexualization.

This paragraph is irrelevant.

The increased sexualization of relationships will push people not only from heterosexuality, but from homosexuality, into even more deviant sexual relationships, because people will feel that they fail to live up to the sexual ideal of each new category created, and so directing their sexual energies elsewhere.

Perhaps, but what causes homosexuality to begin with,

I think you're getting caught up on the word choice of out argument. He's using the word desire instead of want for a reason. "Want" implies a conscious choice while "desire" doesn't which in this case makes the distinction necessary. Why would a Transexual make a conscious decision to endure the internal turmoil that come along with the sense that you're the wrong sex? Yea, you're right, there is a "want" to dress like the opposite sex, but a "desire" to be the opposite sex a different. The want is caused by the desire in that case, the desire being the a pretty much permanent sense that you were born into the wrong body. 

Truthfully, I don't even think I should be speaking on behalf of transexausls because I do think their situation is a bit different from that of homosexuals. On one hand you have VERY effeminate gay men who have no desire to be women and other the other hand there are transexuals. In a way, I do feel like they are on the same spectrum with being gay on one hand, effeminate gay men in the middle, and transexuals on the other side. 

People have been trying to do this for a long time and it hasn't worked. I have no problem with people trying to "cure" homosexuality because objectively I do see it as a "disease" or more accurately social anomaly, but I do have a probem when people start pushing these sweeping generalizations about the psyche of homosexuals.

I have no agenda, nor do I have any problem with finding my place in society. I certainly don't have a skewed sense of morality. If anything, my sense of the world and morality is ridiculously objective considering the fact that I wasn't exactly happy when the realization dawned that I was one of them. 

I really don't want to pursue this argument though because it is one that has no end. I hope you find what your looking for.

People HAVE been living in successful heterosexual relationships, despite having homosexual desires, for thousands of years.  Only recently have people started taking issue with it.

More like, only recently society has been more open to allowing it. 

Though I don't see how overpopulation is a real factor unless you said it in relation to your next point there is some substance and data to suggest that there is truth in your second point. 

Several studies have found that the the gay child in a family typically is the last or near the last. Supposedly, the male fetus is seem as somewhat of a foreign object in the womb and and a women's body naturally tries to "feminize" the fetus. The hypothesis states that as a women has more sons, here body become more adept at this process resulting in homsexual sons. That doesn't explain lesbians though.

As somebody who is working with the help of God to overcome my own homosexual desires, it is right.

They just seem the same as gays to me, who choose that. I mean you wouldn't dress up as a woman if you didn't want to. I view being gay in the same light

As someone who lives a happy life as a gay man and recently got married to my boyfriend of 10 years, I feel sorry for what you're inflicting on yourself.