JoeTheBro said:
My home internet stayed around that speed. My grandpa wired the house and used some low quality cables. My college speed hoever is fast! Wifi is around 50 mbps, wired is 200. Bring gaikai Sony! |
50 mbs? 200 MBS?!!!!!!


JoeTheBro said:
My home internet stayed around that speed. My grandpa wired the house and used some low quality cables. My college speed hoever is fast! Wifi is around 50 mbps, wired is 200. Bring gaikai Sony! |
50 mbs? 200 MBS?!!!!!!


| kain_kusanagi said: Sometimes I think I must be the only person with a slow broadband connection. I can't watch high quality video streams without buffer breaks so there's no way I'd be able to play a game streaming across the internet. If Sony or MS or whatever installs a server farm across the street maybe I'd be more hopeful. But right now I have no interesting in stream gaming. I know I'm not the only one. The US has a huge number of rural slow connections that aren't going to get upgraded any time soon. The US is just far too big to get fiber in every home at a reasonable cost. |
IF Australia can have a National Broadband Network and it is the same size as the continental US then I assume it's a political decision not to.
Research shows Video games help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot
mjk45 said:
IF Australia can have a National Broadband Network and it is the same size as the continental US then I assume it's a political decision not to. |
Austrailias net is always a thing causing grief to the gamers there, I didn't see a single AU review of Diablo 3 that wasn't just them crying for the duration of it about how they had terrible internet and games that used the internet were terrible. I know of course there is the same regions in AU btw but there is a lot of America where people are more interested in Banjos and their own sister than getting fiber broadband.
Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive
mjk45 said:
IF Australia can have a National Broadband Network and it is the same size as the continental US then I assume it's a political decision not to. |
Australia is about the same size, but it's population is much smaller and less spread out than the US. The same can be said of Canada. It's bigger than the US, but has 10% the population. Most of that population lives within 200 miles of the US/Canada boarder.
bananaking21 said:
|
I pay for 10mbps, but my actual download speed is only 1.24mbps and my upload is a pathetic .41mbps.
You're paying for 8 times what youa re getting and I'm paying for over 9 times what I get.
ganoncrotch said:
Austrailias net is always a thing causing grief to the gamers there, I didn't see a single AU review of Diablo 3 that wasn't just them crying for the duration of it about how they had terrible internet and games that used the internet were terrible. I know of course there is the same regions in AU btw but there is a lot of America where people are more interested in Banjos and their own sister than getting fiber broadband. |
Fiber just isn't an option. I and tens of millions of others live just ten miles from true high speed. Many rural towns don't have fiber at all. It's not a matter of being too poor or too stupid. It's that the US is too big and spread out. It has taken 20 years to get DSL and Satalite internet to homes without cable access. It's going to takeat least another 20 or 30 years before fiber finds it's way to those homes.
For tens of millions of Americans that live just barely outside of fiber optic zones, they have only two choices. Move or live with slow speeds.
kain_kusanagi said:
I pay for 10mbps, but my actual download speed is only 1.24mbps and my upload is a pathetic .41mbps. You're paying for 8 times what youa re getting and I'm paying for over 9 times what I get. |
you guys know that the majority of broadband companys sell packages which are 24mb but it's megabit not megabyte while they have very similar names the difference is exactly 8 times more, if you are on an 8megabit connection the max you will be able to download is 8megabits per second.... which is 1 megabyte.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megabit it is the standard rate used worldwide apparently. tis just misleading due to Megabytes abbrev. being MB and megabits one being Mb.
Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive
kain_kusanagi said:
Fiber just isn't an option. I and tens of millions of others live just ten miles from true high speed. Many rural towns don't have fiber at all. It's not a matter of being too poor or too stupid. It's that the US is too big and spread out. It has taken 20 years to get DSL and Satalite internet to homes without cable access. It's going to takeat least another 20 or 30 years before fiber finds it's way to those homes. For tens of millions of Americans that live just barely outside of fiber optic zones, they have only two choices. Move or live with slow speeds. |
ah I'm sorry I wasn't suggesting that the fiber connection was there but the people were too rural to want to use it, I was saying that there are a lot of areas which telecommunication companys know would have no interest for the most part in the high speed lines so they've not bothered to roll them out to those areas.
Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive
ganoncrotch said:
you guys know that the majority of broadband companys sell packages which are 24mb but it's megabit not megabyte while they have very similar names the difference is exactly 8 times more, if you are on an 8megabit connection the max you will be able to download is 8megabits per second.... which is 1 megabyte.
|
I know it's begabit. That goes without saying. If I had a MB connection I'd have nothing to complain about. I typed it all in undercase so it wouldn't be confused with uppercase MEGABYTE. I do know the difference.
You missed my point. I said I'm paying for 10mbps but only getting 1.24mbps. I'm complaining that I'm paying for about 8-9 times the speed I'm actualy getting. If my rate was 9 times less I wouldn't complain, but I feel cheated.
kain_kusanagi said:
You missed my point. I said I'm paying for 10mbps but only getting 1.24mbps. I'm complaining that I'm paying for about 8-9 times the speed I'm actualy getting. If my rate was 9 times less I wouldn't complain, but I feel cheated. |
ah okie sorry I just figured with the 8x error between what you're getting and what you should be getting a mistake in unit coulda been the issue, still tho even at 1.24mbps you could stream a game around standard defination.... maybe :< I guess that just isn't an option tho for everyone but a lot of people would be able to use it as full 1080 BC and I'd rather have any form of backwards compatibility than that of the ps3slim :(
Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive