Home is one of Sony's biggest failures, and is comparable to what the Vitual Boy was to Nintendo. Not that either is bad, just that both were over-ambitious.

If only I cared enough to show you just how wrong you are.

lol do you care to elaborate on that?

Well if Home was any form of a success, Sony being who they are would be promoting it widely, like at E3 or with tv commercials, but I have seen any such promotion of Home.  The PS Move, the failure that it is, gets more promotion than Home. Going back to the OP, I can't see how Home has made Sony any money considering how it's almost never talked about, now lets all do the running man and chase virtual girls around while we watch the next Sony movie trailer lol

you aren't really elaborating on what was said at all, you said that home was over ambitious and that it ranks as high in terms of failure as the virtual boy

how was/is home over ambitious?

how does home compare to the virtual boy?

etc

secondly home not being advertised automatically means it doeesn't make money? how have you drawn that conclusion?

As much as I don't care about PS Home, it's not a failure at all. It's clearly making them money.

Home is still alive and kicking. It is 100% making profit too, the amount of digital clothes/items and furniture sold is insane.

What a stupid comment. I wouldn't call a product that makes a profit a failure. And your comparrision to the virtual boy is beyond retarded. 

I don't... I don't understand.

Sources indicate that Sony have made a lot of money from Home, and you think it hasn't made them any money because you don't see it?

You're entitled to your opinion, if you think Home is a bad idea/poor service that's fine.  I don't particularly think it's too great.  But to mock all the people who do actually use it isn't really particularly fair.  It does what it does well.  Whether or not that appeals to you personally is a different matter.

If proof were ever needed that people are still ignorant about Home...