By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Wayne Swan, Australian Deputy Prime Minister, Warns Of Republican 'Cranks And Crazies'

CANBERRA, Australia -- Australia's deputy prime minister warned Friday that the greatest threat to the U.S. economy are the "cranks and crazies" in the Republican Party, a rare foray into American domestic politics that was blasted by the opposition.

Wayne Swan, who also is treasurer and his center-left Labor Party government's ranking finance minister, took aim at the tea party during a speech to a business forum, breaking a convention among Australia's major parties to steer clear of U.S. domestic political debates.

"Let's be blunt and acknowledge the biggest threat to the world's biggest economy are the cranks and crazies that have taken over a part of the Republican Party," Swan said.

He said "the extreme right tea party wing" of the Republican Party had held the national interest hostage during last year's debate over the U.S. borrowing limit despite President Barack Obama's "goodwill and strong efforts."

He said it was imperative that Congress reach an agreement to support growth and avoid a "fiscal cliff" of deep government spending cuts and higher taxes in January, which he said could push the U.S. economy back into recession.

The conservative opposition said Swan's speech betrayed his "hatred" of Republicans.

"The Labor Party is peddling hatred and they're got to stop," opposition treasury spokesman Joe Hockey told reporters. "They hate the Republican Party. I'd like Wayne Swan to say something positive about someone somewhere."

Prime Minister Julia Gillard, who travels to New York next week to address the U.N. General Assembly, defended her deputy's comments as "appropriate."

"What happens in the U.S. economy matters to the world economy and it matters to us," she told reporters. "Wayne Swan was making that very common sense point today."

Adam Lockyer, a lecturer at Sydney University's U.S. Studies Center, described Swan's speech as "a clumsy political move" that left him open to attack from his political enemies.

Lockyer said Swan might have been attempting to link the tea party to the obstructionism of the Australian opposition, which has thwarted Labor's legislative agenda in a finely-balanced Parliament.

Australia has long maintained that its close relationship with Washington, and its 61-year-old defense alliance, remains strong regardless of who is in the White House.

Former conservative Prime Minister John Howard was widely criticized in 2007 when he claimed Obama, then a Democratic presidential nominee, represented al-Qaida's interests.

Howard, a staunch U.S. ally in the Iraq war who lost elections later that year after 11 years in power, created one of the first controversies of Obama's presidential campaign by attacking his plan to withdraw troops.



Around the Network

I couldn't agree more



On what planet is it crazier to use the latest raising of the debt ceiling as an opportunity to seek some (pitifully moderate) fiscal restraint than it is to just keep piling on debt like there's no tomorrow?



badgenome said:
On what planet is it crazier to use the latest raising of the debt ceiling as an opportunity to seek some (pitifully moderate) fiscal restraint than it is to just keep piling on debt like there's no tomorrow?


It's clear you don't understand economics. Also have not payed attention and seem to forget.

 

Obama also put 10-1 on the table or 10$ of cuts for one $1 of revenue. Your kidding! That was a massive shift to the right and the Tea party wouldn't accept it. So Who is clearly not willing to work with anyone. Signing a pledge to Grover Norquist to never raise tax's isn't insane enough apperently.



spaceguy said:

It's clear you don't understand economics.

It's clear you don't understand debt or debt ceilings.



Around the Network
badgenome said:
spaceguy said:

It's clear you don't understand economics.

It's clear you don't understand debt or debt ceilings.



WE where selling bonds fine. Look above to reread my edit. . Congress is the problem and republicans run congress. They spend the money, make the bills.

Debt ceiling is made by congress. However the Republican wouldn't agree if you gave them everything they wanted. They want the system to crash so people like you blame obama. I'm not a fan of obama but if this isn't clear to you then your in the dark and worthless to debate with.



spaceguy said:

republicans run congress.

It's clear you don't understand Congress, either.



badgenome said:
spaceguy said:

republicans run congress.

It's clear you don't understand Congress, either.


House ran by majority Republicans, DONE NOTHING. Senate A small majority of Democrates that get filabustered by republicans. Congress holds the power and if you don't know that you need to read the constitution.



spaceguy said:

House ran by majority Republicans, DONE NOTHING. Senate A small majority of Democrates that get filabustered by republicans. Congress holds the power and if you don't know that you need to read the constitution.

The House has passed a lot of stuff, the Senate just won't take it up and wouldn't pass it even if they did. But the fact of the matter is, it's a divided Congress and is therefore not run by Republicans.

And if you don't understand how the executive branch has usurped a lot of Congress' power, you need to read a goddamn newspaper.



Why do people want to see more compromise? It's compromise that got us into this fucking mess to start with.