Linkzmax said:
happydolphin said:
TruckOSaurus said: Oh about Happy, he's certainly not in my most trusted list. That little exchange with prof didn't sit well with me and he's been hiding too long behind the excuse that he's not used to our big games. |
I'd expect to have just about as many posts as you this game. I've been participating a similar amount to you, so I'm not sure why you'd distrust me.
D'ailleurs, I'm the first to claim Corrupted Human, so it would be quite odd for a non-corrupted human to be able to come up with that.
Linkzmax said:
TruckOSaurus said: Of course you could have. What could have prevent you from it? |
That would amount to suicide if and when happy flips a named shadowling.
|
It could have been just a townie mistake on your part. If it was scum pitting town v town (which I suspected), then yes in retrospect it would be putting you in a very bad spot (which you already are in, and I wouldn't think town would be silly enough to let you go from the vice they have you in currently).
|
Then we're in a different state of opinion on the matter. That's the kind of thing that one is not simply just wrong about. If you were shadowling with a name and the issue got pushed to your lynch and you indeed flipped a town named shadowling, I would have expected either prof or myself to be lynched. And if it was prof first, who somehow lied the whole thing into existence, I would expect to have been lynched after him, otherwise my lynch would have proved both actually exist.
And I see you still have a skewed view of what went on there. While I was with prof about shadowlings not having a name, I did not agree that you were a liar. However, I was saying that you caused the mess to be much bigger than it had to have been.
|
@bold. I never said as much. All you did was follow the convo and put pressure on me, never mentioning anything about what you were or were not. As such, you would have nothing we could tag you on no matter what I flipped, because you were just playing devil's advocate and never made a specific claim (i.e. shadowlings have a name, shadowlings don't have a name), you were just saying "HappyD, you don't know _if_ shadowlings don't have names". So I don't only disagree, but I have a reason to. You don't. Prof however would have been in danger of a lynch in that occurrence since he claimed nameless shadowspawn at the time, you didn't.
So me hypothetically flipping named shadowling would not lead to your death in any way. So your point to TOS up there ^^, it's BS.
This makes it ever so clear to me that your prestine game by which you claim the least possible so as to not be pegged anythings gives me the suspicion that you're hiding something. Once you knew how the flavor worked, you claimed "talented" shadowling or something like that. Luckily we have a conclusive scan from prof to get rid of you before you make any more ripples and mislead town by attacking a player you know has been an easy target (myself).