By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Bayonetta 2: Developers Explain Why They Sided With Nintendo

Bayonetta is a really good game but not enough to make me buy a Nintendo console. I hope they release a director's cut on all three later on, Team Ninja released Ninja Gaiden on PS3 with a different name so I hope they do the same.



Around the Network
RafaelOrix said:
IIIIITHE1IIIII said:

This looks like a new- more advanced breed of bullshit.


The whole thing is pretty sad, actually.

I actually laughed right now, but I should be sad since you are right. There is nothing wrong with them doing this decision, but lie to their buyers is another thing. Better be quiet than do this PR.

I honestly don't see the bullshit.



z101 said:
binary solo said:

Fact is for the franchise to become stronger and reach "more and more" (not just a few more) gamers it needs to be on all 3 nexgen consoles.


Fact is: Sega didn't want to produce this game.

I don't think that Platinum asked Nintendo first, they surely asked Sony & Microsoft but they obviously refused support. Without Nintendo there would be no Bayonetta 2.

Your fact does not negate my fact, so it's got nothing to do with what I wrote. The fact is the PG dude said they want to make the franchise stronger and reach "more and more gamers". They did the one thing with the highest probability of ensuring the game doesn't achieve the PG franchise growth spin. Hence the PG spin is garbage and they should have just come out and told the truth, which is where your fact comes in.

PG would have been idiots to ask Sony or MS first. Going to any 1st party publisher for a previously multiplat title that sold modestly is a backwards move. PG probably would have wanted Sega to let another 3rd party publisher have the game, but I would think Sega would not want another 3rd party to have it. So PG probably went to Nintendo first and only, as Nintendo are more likely to offer favourable terms in order to snatch a franchise away from the competition.

As I said, that's all fine and good. But PG should be honest about it and don't try to feed gamers a line of bull about it being a growth strategy.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

Cobretti2 said:
this is so stupid

buy all three consoles. That is what I did as a Wii onwer because Nintendo took a completely different direction.

Can't afford it? Then fucking save money, they aren't due out for another year.


I personally don't care about the bayonetta series,but come on unless your a hardcore gamer,no one is going to do that. It's not that simple,for some people.



Play4Fun said:
IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
Play4Fun said:


New/niche games have a better chance of selling well on a new console. Customers are more open-minded at that time than they are mid to late gen.

If it was on PS360, it would probably have sold worse than the first considering how saturated the sales of those consoles are thanks to a gen that has been going on to long.


Even if this was true, putting the title on all three consoles would still result in the most sales.


Which part of the game was cancelled and Nintendo is financially backing  it don't you people understand?


the bit about why they are suppose to care about those details.  most households do not have every consoles and if mommy won't buy them another toy they miss out on a game they want to play.

when VC2 went to psp we saw a lot of outcry too (including myself).  any time any series in any way shuns the hardware it's predecessors are on there will be outcry.  who wants to buy a new hardware for one game?  ..i know i didn't get a psp for VC.  fuck that shit.



Around the Network

I don't understand why this game is so important now



spurgeonryan said:
They are just mad because now they will have to buy a Wii U even though they did not. Hopefully Nintendo can keep these gamers hooked.


yes, and there are quite a few people on board to buy a wii for Bayonetta, hence one of the reasons Nintendo scooped it up




IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
Play4Fun said:


New/niche games have a better chance of selling well on a new console. Customers are more open-minded at that time than they are mid to late gen.

If it was on PS360, it would probably have sold worse than the first considering how saturated the sales of those consoles are thanks to a gen that has been going on to long.


Even if this was true, putting the title on all three consoles would still result in the most sales.

Yes, and you could say the same for Mario, Halo and God of War.....  No one seems to complain when the game they like is exclusive to the system they like do they?  There's a continuous pissing match on the forums between Xbox 360 & PS3 fans as to who has more or better exclusives.  I own all the systems, so I get to choose whatever game I want, and all three current systems have some great games....



IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
Play4Fun said:


New/niche games have a better chance of selling well on a new console. Customers are more open-minded at that time than they are mid to late gen.

If it was on PS360, it would probably have sold worse than the first considering how saturated the sales of those consoles are thanks to a gen that has been going on to long.


Even if this was true, putting the title on all three consoles would still result in the most sales.

It depends on thre marketing and so on.  Sometimes, by being an exclusive, you get added marketing and focus put on it, and it leads to more sales.  It would be suspect that Gears of War, for example, if it was multiplatform, would of done as well as it did.  There is a chance it would of fell into the Bulletstorm level, had it not been for the marketing campaign of Microsoft.  Being an exclusive makes a title special.  Besides the lower costs, going exclusive can end up getting the game attention it needs.



Cthulhu said:
I don't understand why this game is so important now

The outrage is not about the game per se, the outrage is because of the exclusion of consoles.   They are ditching the userbase that supported them, when they released the first game.