Max, the only thing you are proving by witholding the link is how important context is.  

context. people were talking. some people agreed some peole didnt. that comment was made. eveything else is irrelevant. How does context justify calling posters unereducated? calling posts bullshit?

it matters, because for some reason you aren't showing us the actual post.  There is obviously something missing here that you aren't showing or you would have posted links already.  How do we know this is even a real post on these forums?  

its word for word. Its a controversial thread and i dont wan bias playing a role. Now tell me, how is that post that calls people misinformed, undereducated and loyal servants along with calling posts bullshit acceptable?

honestly, I don't actually believe you that it is word for word, and nobody else seems to either.  That is the problem.  I have tried googling part and all of that post and the only thread that pops up is this one.  It does not appear to be a real post.  I'm done responding to you unless you actually supply a link. 

okay then, assume its  a hypothetical then (lol) Defend the post. Why would 2 or 3 mods deem it okay?

let me see the thread and I will tell you, just pm it to me if you don't want the others to see.  

Notonly was it reported multiple times to by me but thats the specific post i mesaged kantor about along with one other. I want to see the mods have to say about it. Im surprised you havent found it on google because thats how i found it but i will pm you.

I PMed you. I just ask that you dont post the link and jus confim it so that bias doesnt pla a role because of original topic. Id like them to respnd on it before revealing the post

ok, I won't post the link.  Also, I do agree that it should have been moderated, but in context it was fairly borderline so I can see why it didn't get moderated.  Plus, those kind of topics generally seem to have more leeway for some reason.  It is actually an issue the mods should adress if you will let them see what you are actually talking about.  

edit:  For those wondering, Max did copy and paste the post word for word, only replacing a word with sony.  The problem Max is trying to point out is that the user wasn't moderated at that time because he didn't specifically call anybody out, just implied anybody supporting one side of the argument was uniformed, etc.