By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Disturbing Wii Third Party SalesTrend- IGN's Matt's C

Legend11 said:
routsounmanman said:
Legend11 said:

I notice a lot of people mentioning Mario and Sonic at the Olympic Games as an example of how successful third parties can be on the Wii. It has friggin Mario in the title and most people buying it likely don't realize that Nintendo didn't make the game.

It's kind of funny that the Wii's most successful third party game is one that most people probably thought was a Nintendo produced game.


Why would anyone, especially non-gamers dismiss a game just because it's not made by Nintendo? Most buyers can't tell the difference between a first party and a third party game.


Pikmin sold 1.61 million copies on the Gamecube (16th best selling game on it), do you think if EA had made Pikmin that it would have gotten that many sales?  Wario Ware: Touched sold 2.18 million on the DS, how many copied would have sold if it instead it had been a similar game made by EA?  If another company had made the Mario and Sonic at the Olympic Games with different characters in it do you think it would have made it to a million?


Legend, Your hate for nintendo is so obvious, its making you look foolish now.

If EA could conjure up a way to make a orignial IP like Pikmin it would have sold well across all platforms.

 

 



I am WEEzY. You can suck my Nintendo loving BALLS!

 

MynameisGARY

Around the Network
Legend11 said:
routsounmanman said:
Legend11 said:

I notice a lot of people mentioning Mario and Sonic at the Olympic Games as an example of how successful third parties can be on the Wii. It has friggin Mario in the title and most people buying it likely don't realize that Nintendo didn't make the game.

It's kind of funny that the Wii's most successful third party game is one that most people probably thought was a Nintendo produced game.


Why would anyone, especially non-gamers dismiss a game just because it's not made by Nintendo? Most buyers can't tell the difference between a first party and a third party game.


Pikmin sold 1.61 million copies on the Gamecube (16th best selling game on it), do you think if EA had made Pikmin that it would have gotten that many sales?  Wario Ware: Touched sold 2.18 million on the DS, how many copied would have sold if it instead it had been a similar game made by EA?  If another company had made the Mario and Sonic at the Olympic Games with different characters in it do you think it would have made it to a million?


How many gamers do you really think know who develops certain games?

People buy the games they buy because of word-of-mouth/hype, advertizements, and news/reviews from major media outlets. Certainly, first party published games have an advantage across all consoles but a well advertized high quality title will sell similarly regardless of who published it.



naruto said:
Neos said:
point?

he saying that third party games not sell beside RE4 and RE UC


No, he's saying that M rated 3rd party games besides RE4 and RE UC won't sell.  There are a lot of 3rd party games selling better than either of those games, but they're not M rated.

Legend, Your hate for nintendo is so obvious, its making you look foolish now.

Don't be too hard on him.  He's a big fan of the console that's almost certain to finish this generation with a distant third and probably had to replace his 360 several times with MS already. 



plus nintendo doesnt even advertise nearly 1/2 of Sony and M$ and they still sell exeptionally well.



I am WEEzY. You can suck my Nintendo loving BALLS!

 

MynameisGARY

im gonna use this anology that alot of you wii users (which is 100% bias but oh well) use on us ps3 users and maybe you will understand where myself and others are coming from... ps3 was expected to sell more at this point because of the ps2's high amount of sales right? isnt that what yal say??? well if the gamecube nor the n64 were known for selling a high amount of mature rated games on the system why all of a sudden would developers and publishers all of a sudden flock to it?? the fact that people are naming mario and sonic as the great 3rd party savior is sad..... im not saying this to flame so say what you want .. i dont care.. but the truth is that this is just how its gonna be.... the wii will continue to get the dumbed down side story game to fit the people they are selling systems too.. my grandma and my girlfriend...both of which dont buy M rated games or any game near that category.. yea they might get a couple here and there but not as much as ps360



URNOTE Proud Owner of a 60GB PS3 Console (Purchased 12/22/06)

 #1 reason MGS4 is PS3 exclusive  xbox is too loud for snake to sneak around
PSNTAG= Xander732

Around the Network
Legend11 said:
ItsaMii said:
Legend11 said:
weezy said:
...

Legend just relax dude. Dont take at heart everything fanboys have to say.


I don't, I actually just laugh at how naive some of them are.


You ... laughing at clueless fanboys? This is like a eunuch making fun of a man with impotency problems. If Wii fanboys are so blind to see anything, please enlighten us with your wisdom. Could you tell me your sales projections for Mario Galaxy, SSBB and Mario Kart?


Well I predict none of them will sell very much in Brazil, way too many thieves stealing games down there.


That is the beauty of globalization. Thieves from Canada and other countries can help thieves in Brazil. American thief develops the modchip, Chinese thief distributes it, Canadian and Brazilian thieves buys and install it. In the end everyone is happy.


I wish there was a way for people from other nations to help sad and pathetic losers in Canada get a life ...
Wife, friends, job ... That kind of stuff.

Being the mature guys we are, we both know that our posts are not a reference to any user here in VGChartz. 



Satan said:

"You are for ever angry, all you care about is intelligence, but I repeat again that I would give away all this superstellar life, all the ranks and honours, simply to be transformed into the soul of a merchant's wife weighing eighteen stone and set candles at God's shrine."

weezy said:
Legend11 said:
routsounmanman said:
Legend11 said:

I notice a lot of people mentioning Mario and Sonic at the Olympic Games as an example of how successful third parties can be on the Wii. It has friggin Mario in the title and most people buying it likely don't realize that Nintendo didn't make the game.

It's kind of funny that the Wii's most successful third party game is one that most people probably thought was a Nintendo produced game.


Why would anyone, especially non-gamers dismiss a game just because it's not made by Nintendo? Most buyers can't tell the difference between a first party and a third party game.


Pikmin sold 1.61 million copies on the Gamecube (16th best selling game on it), do you think if EA had made Pikmin that it would have gotten that many sales?  Wario Ware: Touched sold 2.18 million on the DS, how many copied would have sold if it instead it had been a similar game made by EA?  If another company had made the Mario and Sonic at the Olympic Games with different characters in it do you think it would have made it to a million?


Legend, Your hate for nintendo is so obvious, its making you look foolish now.

If EA could conjure up a way to make a orignial IP like Pikmin it would have sold well across all platforms.


I don't hate Nintendo, I've bought Nintendo consoles in the past as well as Microsoft, Sony, and Sega ones.

As for those questions I've asked I think it's a similar situation to how Western third party games sell in Japan.  They can make games that are similar or even rival ones like Gran Turismo, Street Fighter 2, Metal Gear Solid, etc, and yet they only get 1/10th of the sales (or less) in Japan.  The games I mentioned, Pikmin and Wario Ware in particular I have no doubt would have sold much less if made by any other company.



"Pikmin sold 1.61 million copies on the Gamecube (16th best selling game on it), do you think if EA had made Pikmin that it would have gotten that many sales? Wario Ware: Touched sold 2.18 million on the DS, how many copied would have sold if it instead it had been a similar game made by EA? If another company had made the Mario and Sonic at the Olympic Games with different characters in it do you think it would have made it to a million?"

Yes Yes and no.

Nintendo has a history of creativity and the desire to market games as such. Both Pikmin and Pikmin 2 received a substantial amount of advertising and media preview. EA's track record with such titles like this are to develop them and shit them out the door quietly, so as not to draw attention away from Madden and Need for Speed. Likewise if Wario Ware Touched, a sequel to a game developed for the GBA in 2003 (when EA thought the GBA was a licensed movie game garbage dump) had actually been thought up by EA in 2003 and marketed and hyped by EA (at the expense of Madden and Need for Speed) there is a high possibility that it would have also garnered sales. Nintendo took RISKS with both of these titles. Pikmin is a strange RTS and Wario Ware is just a big ol pile of weird, but they RISKED making them. Pikmin could have easily flopped and likewise Wario Ware. They have made RISKS that didn't pay off, Donkey Kong Jet for instance, but their success is reflective of their desire to actually market these games instead of quietly developing the creative games in the corner, much akin to a 12-year old masturbating. They seem ashamed of them.

Mario and Sonic at the Olympic Games without Mario and Sonic in it is paradoxical, because the title of the game would have to be changed to reflect their absence, and thus would not have been the same game, thus neutering your point of the characters' popularity producing sales. The inclusion of the characters is tied to the concept and has nothing to do with the DEVELOPER of the title and basically proves the point that it didn't mater if Nintendo had developed that game (FUNNY THING! They didn't.)



@naruto : Chocobos were on top in the PS era with FF7. Nowadays they look has been, FF Fables Chocobo Tales didn't sell much, neither did Chocobo Dungeon Wii (though it sold a bit more).



bluster said:
naruto said:
bluster said:
naruto said:
bluster said:
naznatips said:
naruto said:

this how the way i see it third party japanese games on Wii, 360 and PS3 are bad in general

so if japanese developer i try to make games on PS2, DS or PSP

it's simple Japan is becoming fully Portable gaming lovers Period.


I'd agree with that statement in general, but that doesn't stop developers from trying.  There are far more JRPGS announced for the Wii than the PS3 and 360 right now. Lots of artistic games like Oboro Muramasa and King's Story are in development for the console as well.   It's true that the recession has hit the home console market hard in Japan, but the 3rd party market that's left really is given no choice but to make Wii games if they wish to develop for a home console.  


Exactly!

When a japanese developer plans to bring a JPRG or other Japan oriented title, is going to put it in the console that sells the most software and has lowest costs, or is it going to put in a console that struggle to sell more games than machines?

Support is coming. At least in Japan. Just wait a couple of month till Square Enix drops the bomb ;)


think about it what is the point of games on the wii  if it's going to bomb because japanese Wii gamers are buying Wii fit, Mario Galaxy, Wii Play and all the other mini games


OK, lets put it this way.

Imagine that a year from now the install bases in Japan are as follow

WII: 9,5 Millions

PS3: 4 Millions

That numbers are more or less acurrate, in fact I think I am beeing kind with the PS3

So imagine, SquareEnix, to put an example, anounces (insert ultra hyped JRPG). In wich console you think it is going to sell the most? Japanese buy whatever SE does, but, will the company risk their franchises and force people to buy PS3s just to play (insert ultra hyped JRPG)? Or will they release it in a console with, at leaste 2x the user base and proven good results (after all DQS and Chocobo selled quite well considering the type of games they are)

Just think about it


dude DQS sold very well on the wii in japan  but Chocobo Wii Flop Hard in japan also

they are  currently at one win / one lose situation

Plus since DQ sells mostly come from japan it's going to bomb in US and EU

EX: DQ VIII  only sold over 400k in US on PS2 but Millions in japan

 

 

Meanwhile, Dragon Quest VIII has sold over four million copies worldwide, including over 400,000 copies of the game in North America.

http://www.galbadiax.com/article/2006-01-30/dq-yangus

and let's look at tales games

The figure accounts for sales of 20 titles, including fan disks and "gaiden" side-stories, since the original Tales of Fantasia on the Super Famicom. Not surprisingly, Japan gets the bulk of the sales at 87%. America comes in second at 8%, with Europe lagging at 3% and the rest of Asia at 2%.

http://games.ign.com/articles/840/840723p1.html?RSSwhen2007-12-11_061300&RSSid=840723

 

 

 

 


You are not looking the whole situation. Before answering, you should check all the numbers. After all VgChartz is for that.

Chocobo Dungeon Wii-------->100 k in 4 weeks

Chocobo Dungeon 1 PSX----->1,14 m LTD

Chocobo Dungeon 2 PSX----->580 k LTD

Flopped? Mmmmmm, I think is a 2 win/o lose to SE


dude it floped  after it hit 100k on the wii  and it fell the charts and stayed there

 

even the JRPG calledFloped

 

 

while SMG, wii fit, wii play,   and wii sport  are still on the charts

Japanese games wii gamers have spoken They want casual games

 

i don't hate any first party company but this is a problem