By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 45: Friendship is Mafia

theprof00 said:
mantlepiecek said:
theprof00 said:
mantlepiecek said:

I don't think it was mario. It was hat I was addressing and I voted radish.

Mario has been clean in my list or at least neutral throughout day 1.

You're right, that was hat. Sry-

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4744617
In this post, after being accused of buddying, you respond that you were not buddying due to the fact that you were questioning Mario as well.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4744721
In this post you say there is no reason for Mario to know about a third party. You just said above that you knew the proof at a reasonably early point in the thread. Page 2 or so.

Are you expecting some answer?

The first one was a confusion btw. Linkz addressed it as well.

I'll just get to my point since, this line of questioning seems like it's not leading anywhere. It is in my opinion that you were suspicious of Mario after his meta thing. Shortly after Hatmoza did the same. You then said that Hat was definitely town and started moving your suspicions away from Mario and at Radish, who as I mentioned previously was an easy target for suspicion. You reinforced several of Hat's arguments but kept your attention away from Mario.

Then you were called on your support for Hat by Linkz, and you made a quick reversal of your opinion, with Hat actually starting to become a suspect of yours.


Further, just in our exchanges recently, you said " I figured if he wanted to mislynch mario he wouldn't use something that has proof against already, but he didn't know it." I asked for clarification because nobody knew the proof until later on. You clarified that you knew the proof right away. Yet several of your initial posts against Mario are leading questions revolving around Mario's meta.

Proof in this case was FF's post regarding the elements being scum. That was posted a lot earlier that hat did.

Also I became suspicious of hat because all the time I thought hat didn't read that post, but he actually quoted it.

Later on in day 1 I realized there were some ways hat might have missed it. Like he just read elements = mafia part of the post since it was in bold and decided that was enough?



Around the Network
mantlepiecek said:
theprof00 said:
mantlepiecek said:
theprof00 said:
mantlepiecek said:

I don't think it was mario. It was hat I was addressing and I voted radish.

Mario has been clean in my list or at least neutral throughout day 1.

You're right, that was hat. Sry-

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4744617
In this post, after being accused of buddying, you respond that you were not buddying due to the fact that you were questioning Mario as well.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4744721
In this post you say there is no reason for Mario to know about a third party. You just said above that you knew the proof at a reasonably early point in the thread. Page 2 or so.

Are you expecting some answer?

The first one was a confusion btw. Linkz addressed it as well.

I'll just get to my point since, this line of questioning seems like it's not leading anywhere. It is in my opinion that you were suspicious of Mario after his meta thing. Shortly after Hatmoza did the same. You then said that Hat was definitely town and started moving your suspicions away from Mario and at Radish, who as I mentioned previously was an easy target for suspicion. You reinforced several of Hat's arguments but kept your attention away from Mario.

Then you were called on your support for Hat by Linkz, and you made a quick reversal of your opinion, with Hat actually starting to become a suspect of yours.


Further, just in our exchanges recently, you said " I figured if he wanted to mislynch mario he wouldn't use something that has proof against already, but he didn't know it." I asked for clarification because nobody knew the proof until later on. You clarified that you knew the proof right away. Yet several of your initial posts against Mario are leading questions revolving around Mario's meta.

Proof in this case was FF's post regarding the elements being scum. That was posted a lot earlier that hat did.

Also I became suspicious of hat because all the time I thought hat didn't read that post, but he actually quoted it.

Later on in day 1 I realized there were some ways hat might have missed it. Like he just read elements = mafia part of the post since it was in bold and decided that was enough?

Ok, well carry on. It's still not making a lot of sense to me though. But it is possibly unimportant.

 

Might as well address the other part of the pattern I noticed.

J0, you did the same thing with Soleron, ie; not really accusing pezus, but pointing out your confidence in Soleron, who just happened to be accusing pezus. Can you explain this for me? Is this just coincidence?



theprof00 said:
Linkzmax said:
theprof00 said:
Linkzmax said:
Way to go prof! I'll let you have the honors.

Let me take my expert brain a second and guess that you've had a drink tonight, sir? :D

Nope. I'm waiting, but if you delay for too long I'm going to feel bad.

Please just tell me what you're thinking. I'm not even 3 pages in with note-taking and there is going to be a delay.

Nevermind. Everything mantle said now fits perfectly. Though, I still find it bizarre mantle thought hat was town because he attacked Mario for something mantle knew was wrong and didn't point said flaw out. He was quick to correct Mario, for reference: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4744409



zero129 said:
Atm on Day 2 my list of suspects would be Stefl (He has not been very vocal other then placing a vote on pezus very early, and the is some other things too). Later on i will post my reasons and some links explaining why i think this, i will just have to go back and dig out the posts im looking for. and to be honest i dont have time right now.

I noticed your list is one-person long. Have you done away with your Day 1 suspects?



All right, so I've read the thread completely and noticed that a bunch of you asked questions and quoted me.

Alas, it's 1 AM here and I have to get up at 5:30 for school.

I'll come back tomorrow night, and actually answer them. Ciao ~

(Also, mantle, you are so full of shit. That is all.)



 Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."                               

Around the Network
zero129 said:
Atm on Day 2 my list of suspects would be Stefl (He has not been very vocal other then placing a vote on pezus very early, and the is some other things too). Later on i will post my reasons and some links explaining why i think this, i will just have to go back and dig out the posts im looking for. and to be honest i dont have time right now.


@bold so can you tell me on what I have not been very vocal? My main reason for stoping to post today is namely because I and pezus were drawing in too much of towns attention, leaving basically no room for other discussion.

@ mantle, how do you get the impression again that mario is town?

mantlepiecek said:

Why? I am not going to say it yet. Unlike normal circumstances this is even more complicated.

I don't care if it is complicated, I want to hear some reasoning, because a lot of my suspicion is latching on mario, otherwise I'll continue to assume mental ... wait that also is an insult... oh and unless you want to claim tripple night one cop, I do not think it can be that complicated.



spurgeonryan said:
What is tripple night one cop stefl?


It is a role that I made up to provide a complicated method explaining how mantle got to his result, except suffering of some kind of... I should really stop thinking about insulting mantle about this...



Stefl1504 said:
zero129 said:
Atm on Day 2 my list of suspects would be Stefl (He has not been very vocal other then placing a vote on pezus very early, and the is some other things too). Later on i will post my reasons and some links explaining why i think this, i will just have to go back and dig out the posts im looking for. and to be honest i dont have time right now.


@bold so can you tell me on what I have not been very vocal? My main reason for stoping to post today is namely because I and pezus were drawing in too much of towns attention, leaving basically no room for other discussion.

@ mantle, how do you get the impression again that mario is town?

mantlepiecek said:

Why? I am not going to say it yet. Unlike normal circumstances this is even more complicated.

I don't care if it is complicated, I want to hear some reasoning, because a lot of my suspicion is latching on mario, otherwise I'll continue to assume mental ... wait that also is an insult... oh and unless you want to claim tripple night one cop, I do not think it can be that complicated.

I will be keeping some info for myself. I will reveal them in due time though.



Linkzmax said:
theprof00 said:
Linkzmax said:
theprof00 said:
Linkzmax said:
Way to go prof! I'll let you have the honors.

Let me take my expert brain a second and guess that you've had a drink tonight, sir? :D

Nope. I'm waiting, but if you delay for too long I'm going to feel bad.

Please just tell me what you're thinking. I'm not even 3 pages in with note-taking and there is going to be a delay.

Nevermind. Everything mantle said now fits perfectly. Though, I still find it bizarre mantle thought hat was town because he attacked Mario for something mantle knew was wrong and didn't point said flaw out. He was quick to correct Mario, for reference: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4744409

I don't think I was present at the time hat made that mistake. Someone else had already corrected his mistake.



What are the votals atm? Sorry if they've been posted recently- I don't remember it happening



Click this button, you know you want to!  [Subscribe]

Watch me on YouTube!

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheRadishBros

~~~~ Mario Kart 8 drove far past my expectations! Never again will I doubt the wheels of a Monster Franchise! :0 ~~~~