radishhead said:
mantlepiecek said:
radishhead said:
Because Dr Evil is the bad guy?
You can't tell me that this discussion we're having right now doesn't make you look at least a little suspicious - you're took the joke that I made and ran with it, hoping that you'd grab an early mislynch.
Because I believe that right now, the Mafia would gain more from finding out the characters - what I said to Noctis (as I already said in the post you quoted) was a checking-in post joke to annoy him a bit.
|
Same post, different bold.
You say your intentions were to annoy Noctis.
radishhead said:
I was simply suggesting that he could be a member of the mafia (hence asking which one of them he was) - is Spurge the only player allowed to throw around wild accusations? Not that it matters now, since joke time is long over (that was just my first post, after all). Looking a bit defensive of Noctis right about now
FoS Mantle
|
Here you say that you were suggesting that he could be a member of mafia and I am looking a bit defensive.
Explain then, how is it that you thought he was hinting at being mafia (which would be ridiculous) but then you say that you were trying to annoy Noctis.
|
It's not a contradiction- I've actually done nothing but repeat the same idea with slightly different wording to this debate every time, in the hope that you'd eventually understand what I'm trying to say. Here's how it goes:
1) Noctis posts his signing-in message; an image of Dr Evil. Dr Evil is, as his name suggests, evil, so I decided to make a joke about it.
2) That joke came in the form "Which element do you represent?" - ie. I was "suggesting that he could be Mafia" - not a serious suggestion- a jokey one, because, as you already said, it would be ridiculous to believe that Noctis would just give up on his first post and admit being mafia-aligned. I never said that I thought he was hinting at being mafia - it was my first post in the round as well as his, so I decided to make a light-hearted comment about it.
3) I say that it would "annoy" Noctis, because he'd have to respond- I was going to use his response to my joke to try to size up his tone/playstyle in this round from the outset. Not only was this situation nothing suspicious in the slightest, it was actually some subtle, early scumhunting.
For the repeated refusal to let this issue dissolve, we can already see that it's taken attention away from the actual scumhunting - which other players are trying to do, but without much success due to this ridiculous debate. I refuse to believe that you don't have some benefit to gain from completely distracting half the town, effectively making Day 1 useless. At least a couple of those trying to capitalise on the situation are more than likely going to be mafia-aligned, in my eyes.
Unvote: No Lynch
Vote: Mantle
FoS Pezus
FoS Moreno
|
For the repeated refusal? You have hardly put up a satisfactory defense, and you expect people to consider your statements as truth straight away?
And wth do you mean distracting half the town?
This debate is hardly ridiculous. In fact I find your answers ridiculous.
Still one of your statements at least reduces my suspicion on you, although not that much. You said your role matches your character. Either this is true, or you are sure to be claiming something that will match your fakeclaim and since repeated characters are possible, I guess it wouldn't be as risky. Then again multiple roles may not be a possiblity.
