How do I click through to people's posts from their profile?
How do I click through to people's posts from their profile?
I suspect pezus the most right now.
He has tried to appear active but all of his posts are one-liners that are inconsequential.
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4743965
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4744223
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4744526
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4744516
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4744554
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4744548
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4744649
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4744737
He hasn't attempted to push cases on anyone, only commenting briefly on the "current" topics of discussion (radish, the game's composition)
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4744726
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4744649
This is the pattern of activity that mafia use to blend in while contributing nothing.
Vote: Pezus
pezus said: Give yourself some free townie points, Soleron. Are you merely fulfilling your own requirement for town play? And by inconsequential, what do you mean? I answer questions, I ask questions. What more do you want at this early stage? I can't meta, can I? |
One line is not sufficient to argue anything substantial, and the questions you've been "answering" are jokes about last game that serve to make you look active while really not put yourself out there.
What you should be doing is making reads on people backed up by evidence. Instead of adding a me-too line to some popular topics as you've been doing, you could be laying out your policy on No Lynch or on lynching lurkers first night.
theprof00 said: Yoshi youd be willing to pursue both mantle or radish, is that correct? |
I found them the most suspicious yes although the new things people have brought up are making me think twice. Personally I think we need to look at both but I am no where near the level of voting for them.
theprof00 said: Radish i feel is a lynchable target for that "slip". Mantle though, is lynchable for considering radish lynchable. I think most would agree that mantle seems more suspicious. That is because his move against radish appears opportunistic compared to radish's slip. I would argue that a vote for mantle appears more opportunistic, though, than a vote for radish. |
Could you explain what this "slip" is?
Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."
EBWOP:
I meant Radishhead's question to noctis. I interpreted it as one of those generally useless questions that one asks in case of a lie-detector, as in "Are you mafia?" (Which is probably more of a useless question than asking for one's element.
How is it a slip, exactly?
I'll go ahead and FoS - Mantlepiecek. He jumped eagerly on Radish's case. From where I just came in Radish seems like the easiest lynch, so mantle's eagerness doesn't sit well with me.
Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."
Soleron said: I suspect pezus the most right now. He has tried to appear active but all of his posts are one-liners that are inconsequential.
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4743965 He hasn't attempted to push cases on anyone, only commenting briefly on the "current" topics of discussion (radish, the game's composition) http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4744726 This is the pattern of activity that mafia use to blend in while contributing nothing. Vote: Pezus
|
I just got a huge town vibe from Soleron.
This is exactly the same argument I used against Pezuz two games ago as a townie. I was town and he was survivor. The only reason why I'm not doing saying it this game, though, is because it looks like Pezuz's style of play.
Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."
pezus said:
Ok, let's not stand on ceremony here, I have a couple of questions for you: 1. Why would you vote for me and not the other 50% or so of the people who haven't really tried much scum hunting at all (examples: stefl, noctis, moreno) 2. Why would I talk about lurkers? Lurkers will be modkilled, and people who don't post much will be suspected. Is there much more to say here? |
1. Because VGC sucks and won't let me find their individual posts via their profiles
But also because noctis and moreno are straight lurkers at this point. Stefl I haven't looked at yet because I'm working through fourteen people manually (see point 1) but I will get to him don't worry.
But it's not the lack of activity I am getting at you for. It's the content of your posts is specifically made to have you appear to contribute without doing it. Your posts after mine are the most you've written all game. What I want you to do is stop being defensive and start scumhunting. That's not limited to you either.
2. Suspecting is very weak and can allow players who're /choosing/ not to contribute to hide until the late stages. As a matter of policy, and there are good arguments either way, you should have a position on deliberately going after lurkers or not. And by lurkers I mean posting just enough to stay alive rather than disappeared altogether.
You don't have to post on that specific thing, but you do need to be posting specifics on /something/, as soon as you can.
pezus said: FoS Moreno FoS Radish FoS Mantle HoS Zero ;o |
It's silly if you're going to HoS that many people. Especially if two of them are in the opposite sides of an argument.
What's this for, because Soleron is pushing you?
Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."