It is a generational leap for Nintendo.  The WiiU is a huge step up over the Wii and will probably be the only Next Gen console I own.  If it gets all the good 3rd party games, there's nothing really out there that would force me to get a PS4 or X720.

Unless KH3 comes out exclusively on Sony.  Then I'd probably end up getting a Sony.  But I have this strange feeling that it'll come out multiplat or for WiiU.

I would rather they delay the game and upgrade it than release some subpar rubbish.

The PS3/360 version of the game should be the bare minimum for any Wii U game.

We'd been worried that we might need to re-engineer all the effects and shaders in the game, but they worked just fine."

This is a quote taken from the Sega devs comments on the Wii U. The AC3 comments don't make sense.

I believe they are intentionally neglecting/nerfing the Wii U version to appeal to Sony and Microsoft fans. The arguments just don't add up with the facts across the net.

That is just ridiculous.  Completely and utterly ridiculous.  If they wanted to pander to MS and Sony fans, they just wouldn't release AC3 on the wii at all.  Much much cheaper.

They are not releaing it on the Wii. They are releasing it on the Wii U and in an adittedly poor manner.

No aspect of any comment they have made to date suggest that they putting there effort into the Wii U version. In fact, I remember a dude posting in the thread earlier where one of the devs was stating how subpar the Wii U version was going to be.

It is generational leap for Nintendo, but that doesnt mean much when two other consoles have been out for years that were already way more powerful than WIi. So no its not really that much of a leap in the larget picture. THe picture that just DOESNT include Ninty, and good for you for buying only one console( not sarcasm)

THis, its pretty much insane to think Ubisoft would need to pander to HD fans, NVM the fact that we are talking about a franchise that sells millions on one of the HDs alone, PS360 is the biggest audience for this series

Your credibility is fading with pressumptions such as this one.

Might it more likely have to do with having to port over the game engine to Wii U later than the others, having fewer dev kits, dealing with several dev kits revisions, learning  new hardware, juggling mutliple Wii U projects and trying to balance the expected return on investment for a new hardware launch?

No.  Instead of acting like a billion dollar corporation, I suppose their board of directors just wants Ubisoft to stick it to Nintendo gamers, right?

My credibility is fading with forum posters who never cared what I had to say to begin with? Oh, I'm so hurt... How many times are you going to reapeat the exact same passive agressive statement? If you don't like what I have to say then , don't. You don't believe? Then don't believe. I'm not trying to win your favor, when you obviously have no intention to understand. At least I back up the things I say without resorting to personal attacks  in leu of an actual real argument and making passive agressive remarks.

And no, that is obviously not what I meant in the slightest. What possible reaoning would lead you to conclude that I did beside your hope for negativity and your own presumptions? I don't answer loaded questions. Now try again.

You guys sure seem obsessive about posts you see no credibility in. I'm certainly not stalking any of you with no other intent but to start a pointless conflcit. What you are doing is straight up trolling but that is apparently fine for someone reason.

This thread is about "Assassin's Creed 3". What you think of me is not the topic of this thread. Take that elsewhere. Now would you please stop harrassing me and get back on topic.