Who will win the Super Bowl? Part II | |||
| Denver Broncos | 24 | 18.75% | |
| New England Patriots | 14 | 10.94% | |
| Houston Texans | 1 | 0.78% | |
| Baltimore Ravens | 29 | 22.66% | |
| Glasgow Rangers | 3 | 2.34% | |
| Atlanta Falcons | 4 | 3.13% | |
| San Francisco 49ers | 29 | 22.66% | |
| Green Bay Packers | 4 | 3.13% | |
| Seattle Seahawks | 6 | 4.69% | |
| I am a wuss, but I want to see the results. | 12 | 9.38% | |
| Total: | 126 | ||
RolStoppable said:
|
I'm concerned about my G-men, Bradshaw.Deilh, Nicks, and Hixon are all out for this game....and when some gets the chance can they find our pass-rush....
| NYG-CAR | 2 | TB-DAL | 2 | JAC-IND | 2 | BUF-CLE | 1 |
| NYJ-MIA | 1 | KC-NO | 2 | CIN-WAS | 2 | STL-CHI | 2 |
| SF-MIN | 1 | DET-TEN | 1 | ATL-SD | 1 | PHI-ARI | 1 |
| PIT-OAK | 1 | HOU-DEN | 1 | NE-BAL | 2 | GB-SEA | 31-24 |
| Kenology said: Nah, Eagles were bad last year (save for the final four games). Thankfully Juan Castillo seems to have a handle on things now. We're still turning the ball over though >_< but the defense has bailed us out. |
I needed a reason to post this, but I cannot take any of the 2-0 teams serioiusy until they have played a good team. Meaning the 49ers and the Falcons.
chocoloco said:
I needed a reason to post this, but I cannot take any of the 2-0 teams serioiusy until they have played a good team. Meaning the 49ers and the Falcons.
|
lol... nice gif! I'm not gonna say anything though... We'll just see Sunday. :)
| NYG-CAR | 2 | TB-DAL | 2 | JAC-IND | 2 | BUF-CLE | 1 |
| NYJ-MIA | 1 | KC-NO | 2 | CIN-WAS | 2 | STL-CHI | 2 |
| SF-MIN | 1 | DET-TEN | 1 | ATL-SD | 1 | PHI-ARI | 1 |
| PIT-OAK | 1 | HOU-DEN | 1 | NE-BAL | 1 | GB-SEA | 28-21 |
I have lived as a warrior. I have died as a god. Having suffered the ultimate sacrifice, I have been denied release. I...I will defeat Olympus. I will have my revenge
--Kratos
| RolStoppable said: Bringing up possible rule changes again, one thing that I'd like to hear about are the prediction points. Are you guys happy with how they are or should they be awarded to the top 5 each week? Either in a "6, 4, 3, 2, 1" or "7, 5, 3, 2, 1" fashion, because winning the week should definitely stand out; if it were to be implemented, I would personally lean towards the "7, 5, 3, 2, 1" setup. PP being awarded to beyond the top 5 isn't up for debate, because as Week 2 has shown, there aren't necessarily all that many people who achieve a positive record. On the plus side, this would allow more people to attain PP each week, leading to a lot loss tied positions in the overall standings and making things more interesting. On the other hand, it's poised to make things more lopsided in the playoffs when the tie-breaking procedure comes into play. Although it may only seem fair that somebody who did clearly better in predicting 256 games has a notable advantage when only four games have to be predicted. If you guys want to see the PP being extended to the top 5 players each week, then the first two weeks will of course be adjusted accordingly. So what do you think? |
I say we go with what you have and if you think it may be too lopsided then just reduce the points awarded to maybe 3,2,1.
| NYG-CAR | 1 | TB-DAL | 2 | JAC-IND | 1 | BUF-CLE | 1 |
| NYJ-MIA | 1 | KC-NO | 2 | CIN-WAS | 2 | STL-CHI | 2 |
| SF-MIN | 1 | DET-TEN | 1 | ATL-SD | 1 | PHI-ARI | 2 |
| PIT-OAK | 1 | HOU-DEN | 1 | NE-BAL | 1 | GB-SEA | 34-24 |
I'm picking Giants for today, I'll have the rest of my picks in later
The definitive evidence that video games turn people into mass murderers
that's my G-men!! everyone and their grandmother doubt them and they pulled threw!! annihilated the Panthers!!!
| arcane_chaos said: that's my G-men!! everyone and their grandmother doubt them and they pulled threw!! annihilated the Panthers!!! |
No kidding. I didn't expect the Panthers to help New York so much though.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
