| RolStoppable said:
I don't need to hate the Bears to be accepted as a normal bandwagon Packers fan. I am European, so Americans are already surprised that I like any other sport other than Euro-football.
|
fixed

Who will win the Super Bowl? Part II | |||
| Denver Broncos | 24 | 18.75% | |
| New England Patriots | 14 | 10.94% | |
| Houston Texans | 1 | 0.78% | |
| Baltimore Ravens | 29 | 22.66% | |
| Glasgow Rangers | 3 | 2.34% | |
| Atlanta Falcons | 4 | 3.13% | |
| San Francisco 49ers | 29 | 22.66% | |
| Green Bay Packers | 4 | 3.13% | |
| Seattle Seahawks | 6 | 4.69% | |
| I am a wuss, but I want to see the results. | 12 | 9.38% | |
| Total: | 126 | ||
| RolStoppable said:
I don't need to hate the Bears to be accepted as a normal bandwagon Packers fan. I am European, so Americans are already surprised that I like any other sport other than Euro-football.
|
fixed

I'm personally indifferent so long as it was made before the game began. This is partly because this is just a game (based around a game: INCEPTION!), but mostly because I won't be sniffing those rarefied airs anytime soon.
chocoloco said:
Houston is actually quite the threat. It is actually a shame they do not get tested more to see if they could handle the playoffs. Their style does not require Schaub to be increadible just consistant. Arian Foster and the D do more than enough to make this team unique and good. Da Bears finally can show if the are really as good as their record shows. |
Ummmm....No..Just no that Texans are going nowhere with Schaub.Arian Foster is not the best RB in the league the best RB at the moment IMO would be Ahmad Bradshaw. Come playoff time if the Texans even make the playoffs they will be EXPOSED for the crub team they are. Just like the Falcons I can't believe they are 8-0 they haven't even faced any true Elite teams yet.
As long as the change is made prior to game start, then I say it's fair.
@Choco
Don't you just love seeing Manning at the top of that list? :D
isn't my score of 17-28 better than your 20-38 or am i not getting the rules right or reading your post wrong,
RolStoppable said:
Why should anyone believe that you weren't convinced that the Bears would win by a 24 points margin when your buddy superchunk predicted a 25 points margin? You both thought your team is great, but much to your disappointment it wasn't. It's easy to say that it was a joke after the fact. But seriously, Week 9 results pending until this has been properly discussed. I don't need to hate the Bears to be accepted as a Packers fan. I am European, so Americans are already grateful that I like their weird sport at all.
|
After I explained to you why I picked that exact score you can probably tell that I was joking but hey... joking sometimes gets you in trouble. You can do whatever you want since it's your league and the tie breakers won't probably mean much, but you did jump from 5th to 2nd because of the change.
Oh, and you should be ashamed to call yourself a Packers fan if you don't hate the Bears. You just don't get it. As an American, I feel it my responsibility to inform you of these things. I also need to inform you that the Bears 52 points were the most in a single game since they scored 61 against the Packers in 1980...
Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD
Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."
"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units." High Voltage CEO - Eric Nofsinger
RolStoppable said:
Saints won by 15 points, you predicted a margin of 11 points while I had 18 points. 18 is a tiny bit closer to 15, so by rule I win the tie-breaker. Your prediction is only off by 4 points on the Eagles which makes this whole situation as bad as it could possibly get.
I was hoping that the Eagles score a touchdown on their final drive, because the actual outcome isn't pretty. If I greenlight my changed prediction, I'll have to expect the trouble to define at which point changing a prediction becomes clear abuse of the system that is in place. It's hard to hate the Bears when they paved the road to a Super Bowl win for the Packers. And I already knew that the Packers of the '70s and '80s were awful. |
It's your league sir, but I cast my vote.
The Bears would have won that NFC Championship game game if they didn't bring in Todd Collins for a couple of drives. The grat Caleb Hanie was eating their defense up. The problem is that the Bears in 1980 were pretty bad. 7-9 I believe. Losing to that team 61-7 is beyond awful. I would bring up the all time Bears/Packers head to head record, but you should be allowed to keep some dignity.
Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD
Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."
"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units." High Voltage CEO - Eric Nofsinger
RolStoppable said:
I wasn't just talking about the NFC CG. Week 17 of the regular season counts as well. I remember a catastrophic Packers season in the previous decade. Didn't stop them from beating the Saints 51-3. Exceptional days can happen, even if the season is going really bad for a specific team. I don't put too much stock in historic things that are dating way back. I think there was at least one Bears vs. Packers game that ended 0-0, that was during a time when the rulebook wasn't developed well. You know, dumb stuff like the next play has to start where the previous one ended. Thankfully the sport has hashmarks nowadays. In real football, I don't fully acknowledge the World Cups that were won by Uruguay and Italy in the 1930s. If you read stories about how the referees were looking away when the home team committed fouls, then it's clear that this wasn't fair game. But go ahead and post the historic Bears vs. Packers record. |
The Bears did also beat tehm the first game they played.
Yep, all of those games that the Bears defeated the Packers didn't count because of how the Italians won the World Cup in the 1930s.
BTW, how in the world are you predicting the Lions to beat Atlanta at home? That has to be a joke.
Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD
Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."
"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units." High Voltage CEO - Eric Nofsinger
RolStoppable said:
I know that the Bears won the first game during the regular season. It's also the last game the Bears won against the Packers, they've lost five in a row since then. You know, all those games when the Packers defeated the Bears wouldn't count either. The Lions are going to win, because the Falcons are going to rest their starters. |
Fair enough, but how do you expect everyone in the NFC North to defeat the Packers, but the Bears. C'mon, the Bears are a better team than the Viking and the Lions.
Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD
Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."
"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units." High Voltage CEO - Eric Nofsinger
RolStoppable said:
Okay, okay... I confess. I wrote the entire thing to troll superchunk. I already had the resulting records in mind before compiling the schedules, so I had to make some tweaks here and there to arrive at the desired result. I couldn't make it all out Packers domination either, otherwise superchunk would have immediately noticed what's up. |
Well... if the whole thing was written up with the intent to troll Superchunk, then I guess that I can let it slide.
Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD
Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."
"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units." High Voltage CEO - Eric Nofsinger