theprof00 said:
Checking in, says "no im not mafia" in response to LD question.
Gets aggressive with wiibox when wii's comment about "that's exactly what scum would say" seemed like a joke.
Points out that mario answered the same way. Next post basically says "you should ask everyone, not just me".
Says he's human next.
Mario asks why he's getting so mad. He retorts, saying that kind of question is a mafia type quesiton.
Next two posts are sarcasm. Next post is "lie detector can do whatever he wants"
*Quick question Wonk. Was it too early for him to point out that he couldn't be targeted by a LD? Or is it just helping roles that can't target him and that's why he's saying all of this*
carrying on....
Says mario's suspects are bad "piss poor" with day 1 evidence. (I disagree. Day 1 provides good enough evidence for a lynch. And his suspect pool isn't so poor, just in the order it's in. However I found discrepancy with Mario's list myself, so I can't talk.) Anyway, he provides 4 options for a list, denies all of them except for 'mario is scum wanting to mislynch'.
Calls up a contradiciton in mario's list "too early to tell, but 4 suspects already"
Says we now have to waste a lynch on a miller. (Interesting that he uses the word waste instead of "spend" or "use")
Baalz correctly calls out the question of why mario didn't just try to draw a night kill.
Day 2
Says Linkz and I are bickering. Asks what's going on with SAK.
(Baalz then does the thing I noted earlier. Defending me, or having my back)
Says, "spurge take advice when it's given". As much as I'd like to say "Yeah!" Spurge does have a point.
Not sure all the pressure on prof is necessary. SAK needs to be modkilled. Says lynching him is "a waste".
Says he's not sure mafia targeted Radish. Doesn't believe the "hint" that was "dropped".
SAK is modkilled
Says that would explain why it took so long to kill him.
Says mario has a piss poor attitude. (mario was saying "i will survive by any means necessary") Baalz says role like vanilla or miller should be trying to draw a kill.
More talk about miller stuff (getting a bit overdone I think)
Hah! Next post he defends going after miller so much. says "until I get a good read it will continue" Still really interested in why radish was killed, people who showed the "hint" may be mafia. Interested that noc says people who wanted recplacement sak, are scum. Counters that vets are harder to read than that. (Baalz asked for both a replacement and a kill)
Asks mario what he'd do if he counter-claimed miller
Says linkz point about voteless imba isn't that strong.
Appears in the last ten minutes to vote stefl.
Day 3
Votes me. Says it's because linkz obviously scanned me.
Next post, doesn't believe my role anymore.
Says he won't defend himself. He has a character that "literally doesn't exist" and an unbelieveable role. (I still find the word 'literally' a bit dramatic)
Responds to mario saying he will laugh if his self is lynched.
Some posts about vanilla townie, then one about him being absent soon.
Says lynch me now before I leave for vaca.
Says his role is "much more believable thatn prof's, especially considering what I have just learned"
*Baalz is replaced*
PG 10
1)Wonk's first reads after 5 pages are mantle, myself, and mario (1 for 3, or 0 for 3)
Wonk claims Macho, can't be targeted by town helpful roles
I ask wonk what was meant by "much more believeable". He can't explain why, might have been exaggeration by Baalz.
Calls out noc for what he thinks is a contradiction in his pill story. Says fake roles are more likely to carry contradictions.
2)Calls me out for voting Radish. I explain I was eager to play and accidentally voted, but it wasn't day yet. He says he's 'skeptical'.
Hilariously, calls out the post discussion with me and Baalz regarding balance. Disagrees with Baalz, says my role is imba, lynch prof 'because he's a liability'.
He's finished eading day 2. Wants to push for me, or make me take myself out.
Calls me a liability again http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4712706 interestingly, not one piece of evidence in there against me except that he doesn't believe my role.
3)I note that he's tunneling, which was exactly what he did a few games ago as scum "catching up" and only focusing on me. He immediately says he will look at other people now.
Grills noc about the pills and the pill claim.
4)Some nice WIFOM http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4712743
Another post against me, still no real evidence.
Main points against me are:
5)1I went after Baalz (who he knew is town), nen and linkz (who are both guaranteed town) according to Wonk.
2 I'm lying so that I can spring a trap on the last day
3 My role is too unbelievable
Yep, not much at all in there.
Then makes a post http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4712801
6)Lot of bullshit. I'm scum because I haven't caught scum, or defended townies? Evdaded questions...(which questions, wonk? Please ask me them again)
7)Questions why wiibox trusts me. Fyi, wiibox makes 3 voteless roles. Uh oh, looks like someone lost their main argument.
Asks FF why he suspects pez and mantle. Says FF was trying to save me when FF asked linkz "are you so sure prof is scum or stefl is town"
I ask him about FF. He thinks we're linked. Wants to vote me or FF.
Question FF about stefl
More talk about me and FF as teammates.
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4715114
Oh really? Oh sure.
8)This reread has gone downhill. Now I'm just flat out calling bullshit. lol. Another disingenuous post by Wonk above. He links me and FF. Is sure we are scum, yet is mad that he was hammered with 8 hours to go without FF being online.
Mantle shows up after being accused of whatever.
Asks me why I now think nen is mafia instead of investigated.
Says nen is town, unsure if noc would do the pill thing, stefl might just be tired mafia
Asks what's the rush on noc (three votes came in quickly)
Talk about how he "somehow predicted town helper roles". Still not good evidence. Even had there not been another it's not like he took a risk saying that.
Says I might finally be right about scum regarding mario and nen.
Also says. "since you have been wrong with Radish, linkz, FF are probably wrong with nen, and you are were wrong about baalz/ are wrong about me"
(I don't recall being on radish. I also defended FF day one and only went after him after linkz flipped and then I took his words seriously-ish. )
Defends nen a bit to me.
You know...wonk is definitely a contender for a lynch.
|
* why would I be immune to investigative roles? They might "help" town but how does that help me?
1)So with 0 flips of those three you know the other 2 roles?
2) accidentally voting is still a total BS excuse.
3) the two aren't fully comparable though. One I had been in the whole game. This time I came in midway. Also you have played at being town so poorly it's disgraceful to your reputation.
4) so it's ok to say linkz was killed to set you up? but not ok to say, you could be on the mafia team that killed him?
5) Well 2 of those roles I do know for sure. Linkz and mine, nen I don't know but I am sure that he's either town or godfather. You seem to not be able to stay sure of who linkz even scanned.
6) You are the one who always says how good you are as town, and complain in the dead threads of the things that the townies miss. Here you are as town. So where are the scum? Last time you then decided to list almost all the players and say you have suspected them all? really prof? Really?
7) since when is 50 voteless fully voteless? when is not being able to hammer voteless?
8) LOL seriously how many games have you played with me prof? Have I changed my mind about someone after grilling them? Yes, or given people time to claim and discuss things after they do? Yes. Do I dislike it when people hammer too soon like radish or spurge? Yes. After my attention to final fan are you still going to say I have tunneled on you? Yes
