By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 43 - WipEout

Okay Stefl

Vote - Time Extension

@ Noctis

Uh, you semi-lurk every game with bringing minimum comment to the overall discussion, even with explaining your suspects. Cool!

Saying "I do this every game" is an empty excuse, really. So what? It doesn't excuse you from being possible scum this turn.



 Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."                               

Around the Network
c03n3nj0 said:
@ linkz

Well, let's see. You put noctis as your lead suspect for about 5 seconds and then went back to prof. Also, you put noctis ahead of spurge as a suspect, but spurge was never ahead of prof and never had a vote anyways. So noctis was never ahead of prof. Cause prof be crazy.

How am I doing?

Not my post, the post of prof's that I quoted.

And it's funny that my ninja explained half of what was "wrong" with my post. Only thing that isn't accounted for is spurge was my first suspect, and I said as such in a post to FF. Only thing is prof was unmentioned, intentionally, though if you follow my posts there's an indirect suspicion.

So, nice try I guess. No points though.



pezus said:
spurgeonryan said:

Pesuz is being a bit over dramatic.


What the hell does that mean? Three games ago? Game 40? When you were mafia? You were always suspected then, especially by me and you kept mentioning in the QT that you wanted me gone lol

Another lovers quarrel?



I can't fucking quote on this phone, posts end up being empty boxes. Noctis, joke or not, its not really tangible, nor have you provided any further evidence as to why you've specifically THOSE two out. With the exception that it would cut the head off the snake, if you meant discussions then you had a point, other than that you dont have any plausible explaination for singling them out, I've questioned you about it, yet you've failed to provide a plausible explanation other than that you joke about it every round. Well this is kind of not a joke this time around, as we have no ability to vote for no lynch the first day, someone has to dangle.

So far, you're the most plausible suspect to me as you're acting both evasive and possibly actively lurking by giving pretty crappy responses and acting pretty defensive. I think I will stick with my vote on this one.



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.

I can't fucking quote on this phone, posts end up being empty boxes. Noctis, joke or not, its not really tangible, nor have you provided any further evidence as to why you've specifically THOSE two out. With the exception that it would cut the head off the snake, if you meant discussions then you had a point, other than that you dont have any plausible explaination for singling them out, I've questioned you about it, yet you've failed to provide a plausible explanation other than that you joke about it every round. Well this is kind of not a joke this time around, as we have no ability to vote for no lynch the first day, someone has to dangle.

So far, you're the most plausible suspect to me as you're acting both evasive and possibly actively lurking by giving pretty crappy responses and acting pretty defensive. I think I will stick with my vote on this one.



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.

Around the Network
Linkzmax said:
c03n3nj0 said:
@ linkz

Well, let's see. You put noctis as your lead suspect for about 5 seconds and then went back to prof. Also, you put noctis ahead of spurge as a suspect, but spurge was never ahead of prof and never had a vote anyways. So noctis was never ahead of prof. Cause prof be crazy.

How am I doing?

Not my post, the post of prof's that I quoted.

And it's funny that my ninja explained half of what was "wrong" with my post. Only thing that isn't accounted for is spurge was my first suspect, and I said as such in a post to FF. Only thing is prof was unmentioned, intentionally, though if you follow my posts there's an indirect suspicion.

So, nice try I guess. No points though.

Oh. I understood is as a statement that you wanted to keep your post on prof either way. That's why he was voted after he was never mentioned in the same post. Anywyas: 

One thing wrong with prof's post, maybe, because we don't know stefl's way of handling them yet, is that he could've lost night priveleges for all townies (if he's town).

Stefl said in the rules "the entire team" townies are a team. So, basically, whatever prof did with his actions would've fucked everyone on whichever his side is over. His reasonign for waving it off as unimportant  is not very well thought out. 

@ Wiibox - that's actually not what I was doing at all. You read too far into it :/



 Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."                               

Soleron said:

prof: Being erratic, has successfully confused me so I have no idea
j0: his cold logical analysis is making me suspicious. like he's above the game or something
linkz/spurge: cool it lol
notstan: don't understand his Noctis vote
others: Not enough posts to have a read on, but I am collating your quotes don't worry

apologies for short post, I need sleep but I did read the thread. Unexpectedly busy but I will post substantially at least once per day. (informational-only edit: once in UK morning and at least once in UK evening)

You called me cold? 

That's... cold.

I don't understand the impression of me being above the game, though. I don't see how I was acting like it? 



 Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."                               

c03, I believe I saw a post where stefl has said that the punishment has been retracted.. But obviously any future rule breaking will end up having the dire consequences listed.



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.

I'm liking the cut of NotStan's jibe.
Half a point awarded to jo for the most obvious flaw.
A bit under 15 hours should remain.



NotStan said:
c03, I believe I saw a post where stefl has said that the punishment has been retracted.. But obviously any future rule breaking will end up having the dire consequences listed.

Yeah, I read that. 

If Stefl had actually gone along with the punishment, I'd have suggested if the mafia didn't get a kill then lynch prof for being a mafia. 

If prof is townie and got all our power's removed, there's nothing we could do. In a case like that'

a) Stefl would not tell any townies if their action was blocked, so to not reveal that prof's role. We wouldn't necessarily prove anything the next day. 
b) Stefl would notify that their actions were blocked, reveal prof's side, and leave us with nothing else but the hate for prof. We can't just lynch a townie. 

If prof is 3rd party, then we wouldn't be able to prove anything, since 3rd parties don't necessarily want to kill on the first night anyways. 

The way I look at it, prof is probably 3rd party. He's not stupid enough to screw with his own side. 



 Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."