2 of the sweet AG-Racers from Wipeout 2048

Votals:

Quick note of my suspects:

FoS -
Linkz - by mere association with Spurge. This needs more to be a more fleshed out HoS, IMO.

HOS - (I consider it higher up in suspicion than FoS)
Noctis -Starts out fairly serious, then is accusing me for not joking. He has short, one-word suspicions for members. Doesn't really add much besides weak accusations. They're not fleshed out.

Spurge - baseless accusations, contradictory, not playing well. I'm not voting him yet because I want to give him some time to help his case. Right now it's not looking well.

Anyhow, more to the point

Vote - Noctis

conjo pointed out the first. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4661194

The other would be saying that linkz is too focused on baseless accusation and then saying something else.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4661751

followed by http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4661756

yes spurge what you do is very obvious. Although I don't think you ever do what you think you are doing.

If you have to come back latter to try and translate your posts, you are obviously doing it wrong.

spurge don't be radish, accept what you did and move on, denying the contradition on semantics is bad,denying it based on a lie even worse. You say linkz is scum based on stuff from previous games. "http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4660770 note you say nothing of playstlye.

conjo complaines about useing past games.http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4661136 Also nothing of playstyle.

Then you come back with this. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4661166 So if you want to say that you aren't contradicting. Then you are saying "I am useing past games, just not past games playstlye". Something that even for you makes very little sence. So it's not a failed sarcasm detector. It's a lack of doubletalk decoder.

Also what you think of as him copying you from last game he has done SEVERAL time.

What are you saying? 

That you are merely playing Devil's Advocate?

Wait, what? 

A simple yes or no would have sufficed. Were you purposely arguing linkz just for arguing or not?  

Okay, look. I don't know about Wonk or Linkz, but I litearly caught you contradicting yourself. First you say that linkz usual lack of humor was a tell he was scum, as he was forcing humor. And then you say you weren't focusing on playstyles. It's a clear contradiction. 

Not backing off is horrible at this point. The mistake is there, and sticking by what you said no is unwise. You're digging yourself a larger hole. 

So you think I'm tunneling you, yet you admit you're tunneling me.

smfm?

The reason I asked if you haven't been reading, is because you've accused me of tunneling you, which I would say isn't the case.

I think you mean your scumbuddy jo is trying to steer you to stop making yourself look so bad, but you're being stubborn.

*facepalm*

I can totally see why you're always in trouble, no offense.

I will be as clear as possible:

1) Your reasoning to linkz never seemed as humor. You started arguing with him about it. If you started arguing, then whatever humor you thought was there disappeared.

2) We already went over taking things from previous games. Don't.

3) I am not turning anything around. I am going by what's physically there. I quoted what you said, taking it by word. What you said did not make sense with what you previously said. It's contradictory. At least you're admitting to that.

4) I am not telling you back off linkz, I'm telling you to back off your shoddy reasoning. Yes, the humor thing. You can go after linkz all you want. Just... make sense.

Your posts confuse me, spurge. You jump around the arguments a lot.

What does smfm mean? 

Anywyas, I'm trying to get him to drop his bullshit argument because it's annoying the hell out of me right now!