Yep I will be in Canada by that time if that happens. I will watch as it all burns down. Yes thats what these guys don't understand, thats how hitler did things to. Got rid of all the rules and then you can just kill at will and do whatever you want.  Dump all your sh-t in the neighbors well. Whos going to stop you? No one.
So why don't we do that and see how it works out, o yea we did try that and thats why the fucking agencies started in the first place. WTF>

No fascism is how the government is headed. Not how big it is. There is still corruption in Fascism too. Read Samuels post again he has the solution in there. Its small government. You can corrupt what isn't there. The EPA and FDA can't be bought if they dont exist. Any government will have some sort of corruption, the key is to keep government only as big as is absolutey neccessary so you limit the corruption to what is needed. Its also far easier to keep an eye on less people and less organiztions. You shouldn't let private companies control the government either. The government shouldn't need to control so many things. People are capable of looking after themselves and when they have land they will want to keep after it also. The best solution is small government, and a good set of prperty rights.

Here for you people. Give this guy a listen. www.normangoldmanshow.com. He is on in chicago at 5pm. So you figure it out. Hey time is going to change, why have time.

Wow you really seem ot be missing the point. Hitler did not shrink the government, he increased it just as you are asking to do. We are asking the opposite, to shrink the government. But hey why not throw out the HItler argument instead of coming up with counter points. Its the best sign of a failed argument.

Um.... Spaceguy. 

I'm not sure why your using murders as a sign of courrption, but it's worth noting the Conservative party is now in power because the liberals were caught in a huge CRUSHING corruption scandal, the type of which would be unheard of here... directly funneling money to companies that were campaign doners from a government program on the gurantee that some of that money would be kicked back to the liberal party.

and the conservatives have had their own scandals since then.  The US hasn't had anything that bad on such a high scale.

I mean, I don't agree that we should get rid of "all regulations" but you literally picked one of the WORST examples possible.

By the way... I'm still waiting for your reply?  Are you going to admit you were wrong, or are you going to disagree with me and say the Paul Ryan/Bill O'Reily healthcare plan would be great for the country and not be seen as an extreme right wing plan?

Likely you thought the Swiss healthcare plan was like europe.  That with the above seems to show a pattern of you not fully researching stuff.

I can agree that some things need to be thined down but it wasn't these government agencies that broke us. It was WALL ST. So break down the defense budget, I'm all for that. So if there is a big city. slim down the police force because it can be corrupted,  You work at it until you get it right. Things are going to get corrupt with small government too. Know you just put the power in to fewer hands that have a lot of f-cking power. EPA and the FDA won't do anything if it's not there. So let the sh-t just happen> this is stupid math. I would rather have a broker system that catch's some of the sh-t, then nothing and most land owners won't catch the sh-t and if they do what are they suppost to do, shot people. Call the cops, who the cops going to call to prove it. This is just plan stupid.
You Ron Paul people don't study your history. We had this in the 1800's, it didn't work and there was way less people and a lot more land. People still died and got sick and no one gave a sh-t. You make the laws tougher. thats the answer.

You guys answer is like quiting in the middle of a math test because it's to hard. WTF!!

Hm. Sethnintendo wants my opinion on Fascism.

Which is... not positive... since it's like the exact opposite of my political viewpoint.

Though I suppose he's right in it's efficiency... no elections and regulation wise it's superior because the only regulation is "You do something wrong, we punish you." As seen by the Nazi "third way" economic plan.

No loopholes or anything... but I mean, it's fucking fascism. Anti-corruption isn't worth loss of all freedom.

How do you think hitler became as powerful as he was because he got rid of rules. Rules of goverment.  what about the part below.

First, what does Conservative and Liberal even mean, NOTHING! so once you realize that we can talk.  The words only confuse and mislead people to falsehoods.

You second mistake is thinking I'm a liberal. I'm not and I would say I have views on everthing and am not going to be put into a box. Paul Ryans plan I will not agree with. i agree with single payer.

Yes he did, and than he made his own rules of government.

I already addressed that issue. Please read my post fully. You must have missed it. I addressed it before you even brought it up.