By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
spaceguy on 27 June 2012
Edit Thread
thranx said:
sethnintendo said:
thranx said:
spaceguy said:
SamuelRSmith said:
spaceguy said:

this = garbage. You full of sh-t dude.


I can back up everything I said, just because you don't like it, doesn't make it garbage.



You can back up fox news or straight opinion. I just answered there was conflict of interest and you just said that everything can be bought out. Nope if the laws where in place not allowing people from these companies to work at the agencies, this would not happen. This is like saying, people are going to get killed and raped. Why have cops.


There is no way to stop the corrutoin except to remove the ability to be corupted. The best way to do that is remopve positons of power that are not needed and do not accomplish what they set out to do. You can't ban people from working in the government who have previously worked in the private sector. No one would be able to work for the public. Also of note is that even countries with a lot of government, far more than we do, have the same problems and have the same problems of corruption. You have not addressed his issue at all.

Only solution is fascism.  Why don't we become fascist?  If we let private companies control the government why don't we get rid of all the wasted millions/billions on elections and turn completely fascist?  I honestly think USA would be a better nation if it was fascist.

No fascism is how the government is headed. Not how big it is. There is still corruption in Fascism too. Read Samuels post again he has the solution in there. Its small government. You can corrupt what isn't there. The EPA and FDA can't be bought if they dont exist. Any government will have some sort of corruption, the key is to keep government only as big as is absolutey neccessary so you limit the corruption to what is needed. Its also far easier to keep an eye on less people and less organiztions. You shouldn't let private companies control the government either. The government shouldn't need to control so many things. People are capable of looking after themselves and when they have land they will want to keep after it also. The best solution is small government, and a good set of prperty rights.

I can agree that some things need to be thined down but it wasn't these government agencies that broke us. It was WALL ST. So break down the defense budget, I'm all for that. So if there is a big city. slim down the police force because it can be corrupted,  You work at it until you get it right. Things are going to get corrupt with small government too. Know you just put the power in to fewer hands that have a lot of f-cking power. EPA and the FDA won't do anything if it's not there. So let the sh-t just happen> this is stupid math. I would rather have a broker system that catch's some of the sh-t, then nothing and most land owners won't catch the sh-t and if they do what are they suppost to do, shot people. Call the cops, who the cops going to call to prove it. This is just plan stupid.
You Ron Paul people don't study your history. We had this in the 1800's, it didn't work and there was way less people and a lot more land. People still died and got sick and no one gave a sh-t. You make the laws tougher. thats the answer.

You guys answer is like quiting in the middle of a math test because it's to hard. WTF!!