By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
thranx on 27 June 2012
Edit Thread
sethnintendo said:
thranx said:
spaceguy said:
SamuelRSmith said:
spaceguy said:

this = garbage. You full of sh-t dude.


I can back up everything I said, just because you don't like it, doesn't make it garbage.



You can back up fox news or straight opinion. I just answered there was conflict of interest and you just said that everything can be bought out. Nope if the laws where in place not allowing people from these companies to work at the agencies, this would not happen. This is like saying, people are going to get killed and raped. Why have cops.


There is no way to stop the corrutoin except to remove the ability to be corupted. The best way to do that is remopve positons of power that are not needed and do not accomplish what they set out to do. You can't ban people from working in the government who have previously worked in the private sector. No one would be able to work for the public. Also of note is that even countries with a lot of government, far more than we do, have the same problems and have the same problems of corruption. You have not addressed his issue at all.

Only solution is fascism.  Why don't we become fascist?  If we let private companies control the government why don't we get rid of all the wasted millions/billions on elections and turn completely fascist?  I honestly think USA would be a better nation if it was fascist.

No fascism is how the government is headed. Not how big it is. There is still corruption in Fascism too. Read Samuels post again he has the solution in there. Its small government. You can corrupt what isn't there. The EPA and FDA can't be bought if they dont exist. Any government will have some sort of corruption, the key is to keep government only as big as is absolutey neccessary so you limit the corruption to what is needed. Its also far easier to keep an eye on less people and less organiztions. You shouldn't let private companies control the government either. The government shouldn't need to control so many things. People are capable of looking after themselves and when they have land they will want to keep after it also. The best solution is small government, and a good set of prperty rights.