| Slimebeast said: Then how come BF3 doesn't look much better than Bad Company 2? |
lol really? You only played/seen in on consoles right?
| Slimebeast said: Then how come BF3 doesn't look much better than Bad Company 2? |
lol really? You only played/seen in on consoles right?
superchunk said:
|
Bad Company 2 on PC and BF3 on PS3 LOL 
Slimebeast said:
Bad Company 2 on PC and BF3 on PS3 LOL |
ah I see.
| Scoobes said: It's not that surprising really all things considered. Really, as impressive as Epic's UE 4.0 demo is, it's still just a demo and it's unlikely any next gen games will look quite that impressive. On the other hand, Frostbite 2.0 and the DX11 version of CryEngine 3 give EA and Crytek good and proven starting platforms for next gen. |
Actually EA has no rights to anything Crytek does. Crytek owns all of their property. So if Ea wanted to use CryEngine 3, they would have to pay for the leasing rights just like anyone else.
| Slimebeast said: Then how come BF3 doesn't look much better than Bad Company 2? |
I agree with this
Pjams said:
|
I know, Crytek are part of the EA partners program.
I meant to say 'Frostbite & EA' and 'Cryengine3 & Crytek' as seperate entities/companies.
Slimebeast said:
Bad Company 2 on PC and BF3 on PS3 LOL |
well there's your problem lol
Deoz said:
I agree with this |
People who didn't play Battlefield 3 on PC maxed out on Ultra Settings shouldn't talk at all.
There is nothing in gaming at the moment that comes close to BF3 Ultra Settings with 64 Player Multiplayer Maps.
If there are really some people who didn't realize it > Battlefield 3 is one of the few games that are designed for PC and use the hardware that is available.
It isn't a cheap ass Console Port and neither was it developed at a PC and Console side by side thing at all.
IT IS A PC GAME
The Console Version is just there to make extra money.The console Version runs UNDER low PC Settings and has to relie on small maps,less players online and such stuff.
Kids need to realize not every Developer has to fear low sales on PC - DICE has the reputation and after years of Call of Duty with its Engine from 1999 people wanted something that looks awesome.They probably could have pushed even further so you could have only maxed it out with 680s(yes you would have to wait) cause the hardware market made billions of profit at the time BF3 got released.
You can say BF3 PC and Console are 2 different games of different years.
And people who don't see how Frostbyte 2 or CryEngine 3 are already Next Gen Engines > Get a gaming PC and Max out the games.
You can even somehow say the Witcher 2 on PC Maxed out is Next Gen cause the 360 isn't even touching low Settings.
Im curious what we can expect from Next Gen Consoles.
If they don't manage BF3 Ultra Settings from the Start we have a problem.Cause PC Gaming is on a rise again and developers started to push for better graphics in the last few years again.The difference in power got insanely big.We came again much further since last year when Hardware was capable of running BF3 on Ultra Settings.
YukanaSenix said:
|
I am curious too. It worries me a lot that MS is targeting only 6x X360 according to that leaked internal document.
(in some places it was 8x X360 but media has quoted it as x6)
| JEMC said: Well, isn't that the same thing that Crytek says about the CryEngine 3? |
No. They said it is already as good as the Unreal engine 4