Kasz216 said:
A) I'd call that denile. B) Then it's not a job. It's a hobby... and people are compensated for this. In terms of "Psychic Benefits". C) There is no way this works out. Well unless you set up a system like the "End of Work" which you ideolize... which is kinda funny since you seem to view this as a negative. I mean, i think "The end of work" will eventually come to pass, but till we're long long gone. Right now it just feels like "Star trek too soon" philosophy. People I think REALLY underestimate Star Trek's effect on modern thinking and philosphy. |
I make mention of "The End of Work", the book, because the main thrust of the book is a culmination of the concerns that improves in efficiency are displacing workers, and is a good place to center discussion around. I don't necessarily agree in the end of government funding NGOs as being the answer, just that it is one that will end up being considered. Not sure how soon though. I believe it may happen if the economy runs out of frontiers to explot that demand more and more labor for it. Each of these economic frontiers has managed to handle the increases in productivity that has come about.
In regards to Star Trek's effect on thinking, well I would say that Gene Roddenbury was a secular humanist, and Star Trek was his way to preach secular humanism. I believe he stated this in an interview that was either in The Futurist or Humanist magazine (I wish I remember which one). The original Star Trek went heavily into that, combined with a dose of techno-optimism which believed that progress would save everyone. It was very much in keeping with the idealism of the 1960s which gave birth to it. Of course, you see later Star Treks and they moved away from it. I would say Star Trek is more a reflection of modern thinking and philosophy than the vehicle that powers it.