richardhutnik said:
Next Generation still had Gene Roddenbury involved with the project, so it still held on some. It did ended up having less of the happily ever after in the original though. Everything past Next Generation is after Roddenbury passed on. And with the reboot of the series, no idea what will happen. It is possible the original will be done away with, as Star Trek becomes an action focused sci-fi series that is fun summer popcorn fun, rather than a piece to preach values. Star Trek helped to be a rallying point for these values Gene had. I would say it had some depth to it, because like the older Twilight Zones, someone was trying to preach something through them. I find that any sci-fi that has any depth is trying to convey a message of some sort. The Twilight Zones from post 2000 they did, actually didn't hold up, because they really didn't preach well at all. Could be that society doesn't know what it can preach to it, and it is lame. After all, everyone is supposed to have their own values on what matters, and it isn't politically correct to tell people what is right and wrong... well, outside of telling people it is wrong to tell others what is right and wrong. |
I don't know. I felt like the Next Generation focused more on their utopinism. (Outside of the movies.) I mean, look a the difference between Picard and Kirk for example.
What's funny is, when i watch and read sc-fi i tend to ignore the messages they try and convey and just enjoy the settings for what they are.
I mean, honestly, advocacy through viewpoints via fiction I find largely unconvincing, because it's just that... fiction. I mean, it's pretty easy to make your point when you are responsible for the counterpoint as well.