Millenium said:
Ajescent said:
sales2099 said:
Ajescent said:
Rudisha said:
RolStoppable said: Am I seeing this right? The 360 only had one retail exclusive? And to add insult to injury, it's a port of a PC game. |
what does retail prove??? A digital can be great like a retail title. And what does port prove?? The WItcher is not on the pS3 so its good to mention it on the Xbox . |
I remember a time when Sony fans were making the same arguements with Warhawk and Wipeout when they were PSN only and when games like Star Ocean finally came a year later and folks said those didn't count...what changed?
|
Witcher 2 is a port, but its not on PS3.
When Star Ocean came out a year later on PS3.....360 allready had it. You comparison would make sense if 360 didnt have the game allready.
|
Okay...so basically my point still stands, it seems the rules seem to get changed whenever it suits the agenda being driven.
|
I hope you're not suprised by that... all of these other threads made by Sony exclude console exclusives and Kinect titles, so it was bound to happen in one way or another in this one.
|
Don't get me wrong, I find that irritating as well when people suggest Kinect and Move games aren't "games".
Another one was when PS3 had no Gaemz, people kept insisting multiplats (i.e games on the 360 and ps3) didn't count but now it seems to be fair game. Not necessarily on this thread but still.