By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Once again, no Final Fantasy VII remake in development

finalrpgfantasy on 10 June 2012

forget about the VII remake, I want versus XIII.



Around the Network
Khuutra on 10 June 2012
BasilZero said:
Khuutra said:
rccsetzer said:
How many games were released on 3 double layer blu-ray discs? And 12 Dvds? If "none" is the answer you know why we won't see a FFVII remake.

There is not even close to enough content in FF7 to fill up 3 full blu-rays

Not with the original FFVII o.O, but I'm sure if a remake does happen it would be about 10 times bigger in terms of data than the original, of course that would still be on 1 blu-ray...now HD-DVD....another issue, look at FFXIII l0l

Ten times bigger than the original, with modern compression, could pretty easily fit on one dual-layered DVD

It'd be considerably bigger than that if they tried to voice everything (God I hope they wouldn't), but I can't imagine the game not fitting on a single blu-ray



DieAppleDie on 10 June 2012

3ds port please, remakes usually suck (REmake was great though..)



Persistantthug on 10 June 2012
Khuutra said:
Persistantthug said:


I have evidence and documentation that SONY published FINAL FANTASY 7 in the US and European regions.

 

That's factual.

Now if you want to refute that, then yeah, the onus is on you.   That's how it works, my friend.

I think this would have been more constructive if you learned anything about negative proof, but here:

When you boot up the PS1 version of FF7, the title screen says "© 1997 SQUARE"

Now that little © has a very specific legal meaning, and that meaning is that all copyright for the work belongs to Square

There's a reason Eidos is the one who published the game on the PC: because Square are the ones who can agree or disagree to someone publishing their game. Publishing a game doesn't mean you own it. Copyright does.


Look bro...

YOU HAVE NOT SEEN FF7 remake AND YOU WILL NOT see a FF7 remake.

You'll see remakes of 8, 9, 10, or 12 first.

There's a very good reason for it.....and That's all there is too it.



Noel_Kreiss on 11 June 2012
finalrpgfantasy said:
forget about the VII remake, I want versus XIII.

Amen



Around the Network
Khuutra on 11 June 2012
Persistantthug said:
Khuutra said:

I think this would have been more constructive if you learned anything about negative proof, but here:

When you boot up the PS1 version of FF7, the title screen says "© 1997 SQUARE"

Now that little © has a very specific legal meaning, and that meaning is that all copyright for the work belongs to Square

There's a reason Eidos is the one who published the game on the PC: because Square are the ones who can agree or disagree to someone publishing their game. Publishing a game doesn't mean you own it. Copyright does.


Look bro...

YOU HAVE NOT SEEN FF7 remake AND YOU WILL NOT see a FF7 remake.

You'll see remakes of 8, 9, 10, or 12 first.

There's a very good reason for it.....and That's all there is too it.

Maybe so, but guess what that reason isn't!



NobleTeam360 on 11 June 2012

Its never going to happen get over it.



NobleTeam360 on 11 June 2012
Carl2291 said:
Khuutra said:
rccsetzer said:
How many games were released on 3 double layer blu-ray discs? And 12 Dvds? If "none" is the answer you know why we won't see a FFVII remake.

There is not even close to enough content in FF7 to fill up 3 full blu-rays



Id say 2 discs. One disc for the videogame, another disc to hold Tifa's full HD boobies.

This, lol



Porcupine_I on 11 June 2012

it already has been remade!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Fantasy_VII_(Famicom)



“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

- George Orwell, ‘1984’

rccsetzer on 11 June 2012
NobleTeam360 said:
Carl2291 said:
Khuutra said:
rccsetzer said:
How many games were released on 3 double layer blu-ray discs? And 12 Dvds? If "none" is the answer you know why we won't see a FFVII remake.

There is not even close to enough content in FF7 to fill up 3 full blu-rays



Id say 2 discs. One disc for the videogame, another disc to hold Tifa's full HD boobies.

This, lol

 Yoshinori Kitase's full response to OXM on 2011:

"In the transition between XIII to XIII-2, it was quite easy because obviously we kept all the data and the engine - we had just finished using them so it was almost like they hadn't gone cold. The technology was already warm and ready to use, so it was quite good. Also within the team, we still had a feel for the game, it was still new to us, still lingering with us, so we were ready to move on to the sequel.

 

"But if we were to take one of the past Final Fantasy titles and make a sequel to it, I think that would be a lot more challenging because when they were on PlayStation and PlayStation 2 their actual game volume was a lot bigger, kind of.

 

"Graphically they weren't as advanced as they are now, but there were lots of towns and worlds and cities and whatever. So if we were to recreate the same kind of game - sequel or not - with the same volume, but give it a much higher level of graphical quality, it would us take three times, four times, even ten times longer to make such a game. So making a sequel for an old game would be a lot more challenging."