Fair enough. Even with an incredible opportunity, Uncle Bill could have totally wasted it if he hadn't the strong sense of business and talent and boldness he has, this is undeniable. Kildall wasted it, despite being considered a computer genius, and deservedly so, but alas he obviously had a lot less business talent. This said, Bill Gates is not only a talented businessman, he showed commitment to research and development, while Ballmer is just a businessman, he can use very well what technicians do, but he can't understand them as deeply as Bill Gates did. Like Jobs and Gates, Ballmer can count on an incredible team, and when a product is good enough, and it's there at the right moment, he's like a tank when it comes to bring it to success, but he lacks Gates' geeky ability to make a product look more appealing to computer lovers and even less Jobs' uncanny ability to make common people love tech.

Glad I'm not alone in thinking this is a crazy article. Just seems odd to name him the worst and ignore all the positive. Feels like he was put up there just because it was Microsoft. CEO of Walmart or Sears probably wouldn't be as eye catching.

Bro please, I've got that beat:

Lol! I hadn't seen that one before, thanks! They're classics indeed.

I wouldn't call him the worst CEO. Though he is one of the worst faces of a business, he comes off creepy in press conferences.

That ad is class lol. I'll agree with you that that ad is a classic. But damn his sweaty, shouty, jumpy, runnin around is pure cringe, funny and shows himself up. Let people have their opinions. Free world and all that. Get over it!