No game is perfect. I claimed that Nintendo's Wii games did not suffer a drop in quality in the latter half of the Wii's life, and backed that statement up with average critical opinions. You claimed that said games were inferior and offered no evidence at all to support your claim, merely dismissing most of Nintendo's releases in that time period, often for petty or ridiculous reasons. It doesn't matter what your opinion is of those games, because critically they were generally better-received than their earlier counterparts. You say the games were inferior, and that may be your opinion, but you are as factually incorrect as it is possible to be in such a matter.

If you want my opinion, I could just as easily make up some nonsense opinion that most of Nintendo's pre-2009 Wii games were awful, and their later games were amazing, and I'd be just as wrong as you are now.

You did your own argument more harm than good in your last post. Previously you claimed that the Wii's dramatic decline was due to a decline in the quality of Nintendo's first-party software. However, now you even dismiss early-Wii-life games, including Mario Party 8, Wii Fit, Endless Ocean, and Wii Play. How does Endless Ocean 2 represent a decline in software quality if its predecessor was just as bad, if not worse? And you still have criticisms to make of Xenoblade, despite admitting earlier that you only played a little bit of it; I wonder whether you haven't played some of the other games you criticized here?

By the way, Galaxy came out in 2007. Galaxy 2 came out in 2010. There WERE "a few years" between them.

Yep completely agree with you, compared to the SNES and N64, the Wii had less number of stellar titles. But what the wii lacked in software, its hype and gimmick saved it since it attracted a huge number of people who usually didnt play video games.