happydolphin said: Remember guys, a no-lynch reduces the number of votes needed for a lynch, just so you know. You're almost better voting for someone that you don't want to lynch but are sure will not get lynched late in the day rather than no-vote if someone you don't want lynched is getting lynched. That's for you radishhead. @pezus, by the way, I never got a good read off of Rol. He and prof reak scum or at least anti-pokemon. |
the only way that the # of votes needed to lynch will be reduced is if we had a time limit. Then non votes would be tossed aside and the majority needed calculated by those who voted. No Lynch would still be an option then.