and manuel make 6. So my mistake L4

The L# means how many more votes are needed to lynch. Radish thought after his vote there was only one more vote needed.

Okay. I'm going to re-vote.

Vote: Hatmoza.
Pezus's evidence is great.

I was under the same idea, 1 or 2 left. Votals were way overdue

uhm. you should unvote first 

If you don't want someone to get lynch

Vote: no lynch.

That's the right term. :)

Oh, okay... see I'm a noob.

I already unvoted Rol though. This is my new vote.

@bold. This whole time Rol said that he was following prof's judgement. I mentioned that prof sanctioned my reality (the extra flavor backstory due to role), yet he wants you to think otherwise. He's playing a double-game.

"The one thing that can be said with absolute certainty is that HD is doing a very poor job at defending himself."

This is just absolutely false. I might not have the right attitude because I want to keep playing tbh, but I'm not doing a poor job at debunking the FUD, that's is just not true.

Unvote: Dolphin

I'm convinced- maybe that's a mistake, I don't know.

Vote: No Lynch

What does FUD mean?

Also, I've seen what you and Pezus are trying to say. People, Hatmoza is really suspicious, Moreno, somewhat. (Haven't been paying much attention to him.) HappyD is obviously town and either Hatmoza or Moreno are Mafia. It's quite obvious.

Remember guys, a no-lynch reduces the number of votes needed for a lynch, just so you know. You're almost better voting for someone that you don't want to lynch but are sure will not get lynched late in the day rather than no-vote if someone you don't want lynched is getting lynched.

That's for you radishhead.

@pezus, by the way, I never got a good read off of Rol. He and prof reak scum or at least anti-pokemon.

I'm pretty sure that isn't the case - a no lynch counts for the same as any other vote