and a pedophile.

Veteran as much as you want, I have a slow computer so I prefer the 10 posts per page setup in general. But for mafia this I have to admit is better, I just never really thought of it until F-F mentioned it.

HD and his humans are mafia, pokemon are townies.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4525123
Willing to vote prof for being "human" before even saying his theory!

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4525141
His theory. If he was town and had only his own role, why would he conclude this?

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4525162
quotes himself in what I think may be an effort to make himself not look so bad. By saying scum could use this to there advantage. Although with how much he already knows the ignorance of that line seems forced. Since scum wouldn't need to know if someone was human or pokemon they already know there own team, and if he was somehow implying 2 mafia teams why would he be thinking that then?
He also added he could be lying. When why should he say his own theory was a lie? If he was town and saying a theory he could just say maybe I am wrong. Why the need to use the word lie unless he was trying to distance himself from it further?

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4525664
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4525669
These two posts show him thinking 2 teams with both teams being human
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4525671 a rather odd theory. A single mafia team would be pretty sure if he was town and one of a few would want to hunt scum.
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4525676 with how much of his own thoughts he had shared freely before and knows of the game I can see this as faked ignorance to try and not appear to know too much.

Darn phone, keeps calling me.

I never had any doubts that he had a post in the other thread (because lying about something that could have been easily proven would have been a disaster beyond repair) but I had (and still have) my doubts about him for his drastic change of story, his change of style from serene and defensive to very agressive, and his contradictions.

So yeah, my doubts were never about the post, because lying about it would have been irrefutable evidence against him.

It was a joke... Didn't you even notice I didn't bold my vote, and I said Vote: Oak (a pokemon trainer) and not Vote: Prof, just to make it clear to the more vigilant that I was kidding?

Great, now I get to Wonk you!

And to add to that post above, because it seems slightly contradictory to something I said before, I had doubts that he read all the thread and that he knew How I played, and I was right, he didn't know how I played and what happened to me, so he called me a "veteran" to try to look innocent.

To that post above, I meant mine, BTW.

How do you know what I got in my PM. You might not know because, matter of fact, you may have gotten something very different (being scum).

What if my PM said that, how would you know? Maybe you don't and maybe that's why you, sir, are in fact scum.

Vote: Wonk

AND as soon as someone said his doubts against him were smaller, he got a lot more relaxed and sided with the ones who weren't against him drastically, but guess what? You're still not off the hook.