Doctor, you have your target.

@wonk

I believe a greater threat to town than I exists. I don't want to sound cocky, but the facts are before town.

1) Someone who wants to lynch town siblings.
2) Someone who wants to be lynched just to eliminate one other player. Reckless.
3) Someone who roleclaims torchbearer and presumes special ability to be able to block any lynch, while at the same time getting random confusing PMs from the Mod (who cares just ignore them) AND likens it to the link provided by spurge. It doesn't hold water. See his post for details -> http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4532486
4) Someone who is not pokemon.
5) Someone who lies for no fundamental purpose (http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4532065).

ahem. I was promised you'd vote and push for Doofus' lynch if I answered your questions, prof.

I wasn't satisfied with your answers.

Bolded, how so? When under direct pressure, how does answering untruthfully = entertaining.

Furthermore, once you actually became a lynch target, suddenly you're treating me a lot differently.

I don't get it. When I roleclaimed, I counted on doctor to do his job. I was in trouble, that was what I considered my only option. Outing my sibling was always out of question. We had discussed that from the get-go.

Now, as for what you're explaining, why would you ever do that? If town goes with another lynch (I won't say who) and I am vulnerable to mafia kill, then here are the possibilities:

1) My sibling is hidden by me and stays hidden, the mafia only know 1 way to kill 2 birds with 1 stone. Doctor can protect, they waste a kill. A+ for town.

2) My sibling is revealed, doctor protects one of us. It's a 50/50 chance, but if they get it, it's 2 for 1.

That's just how I see it, just how I'm playing it.

^He is a veteran.

Proving Hatmoza has the abilty isn't that hard, lynch him, then he can do with his kill whatever he wants - which would be killing HappyD and thus getting rid of the question on how to confirm HappyD, confirming HappyDs claim without taking his life is another story - it would really need that everyone claims not to be his sibling, one person not claiming could mean that he probably is the sibling - which would open up a good target for scum - and the problem is, with 2 siblings revealed this means we have the problem of the doc having to gamble on protecting them or leaving them alone instead of just protecting on person or leaving him alone (prof had a pretty good explenation of that gamble on lives)

You forgot the lucky hit on someone else - and the one being your sibling

1) Mafia can target someone at random and kill your sibling. Since we don't know who your sibling is, doctor is unreliable at protecting them. Knowing this, doctor isn't going to waste time on a noob who *might* be targeted, the doc will protect people who know what they're doing, like me, linkz, and others, or people who have hinted at being power roles. Therefore, mafia, knowing that the power roles and good players will likely be protected, they will go after a noob (or anyone else), for that matter, and likely stumble into your sibling. Even worse if there are two kills, you are doubly likely to die. If we know who your sibling is, mafia can presume he is likely to be protected (even if he is not) and will have to target someone else.

2) You are a sibling. Your partner is likely also vanilla since siblings are = masons. Your power role is that you have a better grasp on who is town and who isn't. That's something a lot of us don't have. However, there is also likely other power roles who are more important to kill than you. The mafia is not going to risk being blocked simply to kill someone with no deadly power role (like a cop's power role). Sure 2 for 1 is a good kill, but right now, you are right, your real enemy is the voters. And if you get lynched, that's 100% chance that you die, instead of 50%. Get it?

3) What if we go to lynch someone and that person is your sibling?