| Wonktonodi said: yes you did bold it when you unvoted again but you didn't revote hat at the time. as I sad our mod is a stickler (please don't kill me mod) |
Don't worry. Lol
I just want them to bold because I really have a poor eyesight. I just want you guys to make it easier for me. Especially when the post flies so fast. I don't want to re-read it a dozen times.
| spurgeonryan said: What? I unvoted happyD and voted Hatmoza. Then NoCtis said that I did not unvote HappyD or something so then I made sure I bolded it so that he could see that I unvoted happyD . Just now I unvoted Hatmoza to see where his story went. People tend to mumble and panic and do other crazy things like give up when they get closer to the lynch. |
Hatmoza will not give up, that would go against his stardards - while I did not believe his claim being a vig (though it was a convienient claim), the thing that HappyD said he was a sibling with a noob partner made it clear to me that any noob would shatter under the presure and claim - this is why I don't believe HappyD being a sibling - now with Hat claiming he can manipulate a lynch, why should we not vote for him and let him confirm his one time power and then have a cleared townie at out hands.
happydolphin said:
Hi spurge, at your convenience, 24/7. |
respond to this:
|
I've already explained to you several things but here they are again. 1) You and your sibling are valuable to the mafia because you are suspected by many here, and they would prefer that town lynch you rather than them killing you. As time goes on, and your sibling does not appear, it's going to look more and more like you fabricated the sibling claim. I'm not saying that you did, but on say, day 4 when people are really scratching their heads for evidence, and the game is accellerating, people are simply going to gravitate closer and closer to the question mark, which is you. When we lynch you (if you are town), then mafia will "win the battle"... meaning that they didn't have to waste a kill on the siblings, town killed you for them. Get it? 2) The way to prevent this is to claim your sibling. This removes the question mark and allows us to play without having to wonder about who it is. The questino right now isn't WHO is your sibling, but DO YOU EVEN HAVE a sibling. That's what people do not like about your claim. 3) The sibling outing himself is not deadly, because mafia will kill you one way or another. The question is, do we do it for them, or do we make them work for it. Sure dying seems like a horrible loss to town, but what's worse, the town lynching you when they could have lynched a scum instead? Or a mafia killing two noobs instead of an experienced scum catcher? The best outcome of the four is mafia choosing to kill you instead of a power player. The worst is town lynching you. 4) I think you are town. Everything you've said makes sense from a town standpoint, but the problem is that I can only hold so much sway in the lynch process. If I can't find good evidence against a mafia, you could have the spotlight, and then we'll have 4-5 noobs all thinking that your insults and lack of partner mean that you are mafia. On day 4 or 5, all it will take to lynch you is votes from 5 or 6 noobs. I won't be able to help you, understand? |
It doesn't make any sense to me to ever out a sibling. Outed, we're as good as dead. I don't see the benefit to town in any way. That answer should be good.
| spurgeonryan said: Lol, what happens if we all were to vote NoCtis? I say that I make the next game and no one posts in it! That would be so embarrassing for me. Lol Alright back to current events. |
Lol - in my last game the hammerer would get a oneshot killability item :D
| happydolphin said: It doesn't make any sense to me to ever out a sibling. Outed, we're as good as dead. I don't see the benefit to town in any way. That answer should be good. |
Well, there was once a tactic in a far distant game, where both siblings claimed, but they claimed that one sibling can protect the other, and with the docs help they would be invincible - they lied :D (it was a one shot protection)
Prof, I'll try to answer this even better.
At this point town does not want to lynch me, so that presumption is eliminated. Assuming mafia will lynch me, I believe the doctor will do what he judges best to do.
| happydolphin said: Prof, I'll try to answer this even better. At this point town does not want to lynch me, so that presumption is eliminated. Assuming mafia will lynch me, I believe the doctor will do what he judges best to do. |
you have the second most votes so it could very easily change.
| happydolphin said: It doesn't make any sense to me to ever out a sibling. Outed, we're as good as dead. I don't see the benefit to town in any way. That answer should be good. |
Time to take you to school happy.
Prove to me that you are as good as dead if you're outed. I want a reasonable explanation why you are saying this because otherwise, it's just words with no meaning.
Stefl1504 said:
Well, there was once a tactic in a far distant game, where both siblings claimed, but they claimed that one sibling can protect the other, and with the docs help they would be invincible - they lied :D (it was a one shot protection) |
See Happy, this was our team. Me and someone else were siblings and claimed in order to protect ourselves form being lynched. We survived three days and nights because we claimed, and because scum thought we would be protected. Scum NEED to kill, so they can't waste efforts on a 50% chance of being successful.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
